Re: Size of Swing applet vs. AWT

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Article #8053

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing Previous Next

#8053

From: Rich Wilkman
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00

19 lines
1239 bytes

Sten:

All things being equal, a small swing applet will be several times
larger than the awt counterpart as JFC is very, uh, dependent on itelf.
This means a large set of classes to download to support something as
simple as a JButton.  (Actually, JButton will call in about 60% of JFC
all by itself).  Compare this to awt which has 0 classes to download
because they are already part of the JVM in the browser.

-Rich

Sten Larsson wrote:

> Will a *small* Swing applet be significantly larger than an AWT
> applet? I.e. will it take more than 50% longer to load it in a
> browser?
>
> Thanks!
> /sten

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3A1AA9FD.46EA578D@formlessvoid.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <lerj1t0luvs56u6ae4mcln0be63iabpddv@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111d45,fed7bfadace2972f
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public
From: Rich Wilkman <richw@formlessvoid.com>
Subject: Re: Size of Swing applet vs. AWT
Date: 2000/11/21
Message-ID: <3A1AA9FD.46EA578D@formlessvoid.com>
X-Deja-AN: 696229119
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <lerj1t0luvs56u6ae4mcln0be63iabpddv@4ax.com>
X-Accept-Language: ja,en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: 21 Nov 2000 09:01:12 -0800, 209.144.169.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: richw@formlessvoid.com
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing

Reply to Parent Message