Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing
Article #8054Re: Size of Swing applet vs. AWT
From: Sten Larsson
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00
9 lines
862 bytes
862 bytes
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:59:41 -0800, Rich Wilkman <richw@formlessvoid.com> wrote: >All things being equal, a small swing applet will be several times >larger than the awt counterpart as JFC is very, uh, dependent on itelf. That's what I thought. Thanks !!! /sten
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9ncl1t8m1pie8j8m87apcmrg0qk6usc1ae@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<lerj1t0luvs56u6ae4mcln0be63iabpddv@4ax.com> <3A1AA9FD.46EA578D@formlessvoid.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111d45,fed7bfadace2972f X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public From: Sten Larsson <sten@xdin.com> Subject: Re: Size of Swing applet vs. AWT Date: 2000/11/21 Message-ID: <9ncl1t8m1pie8j8m87apcmrg0qk6usc1ae@4ax.com> X-Deja-AN: 696241987 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <lerj1t0luvs56u6ae4mcln0be63iabpddv@4ax.com> <3A1AA9FD.46EA578D@formlessvoid.com> X-Trace: 21 Nov 2000 09:39:35 -0800, 216.54.8.34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing