Article View: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql
Article #1518Re: SQL vs. DBF in 5.5a
From: John Fried
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 00:00
18 lines
1243 bytes
1243 bytes
Hi Keith, > There *is* no difference insofar as traffic is concerned. Thanks for the clear, understanable answer. I suspected as much myself. I will look at re-writing to eliminate/reduce relations and filters where possible plus forcing temporary tables to the local C: drive (boy did I miss that one big time <g>). The client doesn't really want to go to C/S, so now I know where to direct my resources. Thanks again and have a Happy Holidays to you and the family, John P.S. I will be playing Christmas carols with local fiddle/mandolin groups at various nursing homes for the next three nights. Gee, a real audience this time <g>. Should be fun.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3499A3AE.94A@ipass.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<34993B49.11E3@ipass.net> <34995AD7.6D623D69@DELETE_THIS.hit.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ff5a1,80b4f7477494d14b X-Google-Attributes: gidff5a1,public From: John Fried <dataknight@ipass.net> Subject: Re: SQL vs. DBF in 5.5a Date: 1997/12/18 Message-ID: <3499A3AE.94A@ipass.net> X-Deja-AN: 299465435 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <34993B49.11E3@ipass.net> <34995AD7.6D623D69@DELETE_THIS.hit.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: dataKnight Software Services Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: dataknight@ipass.net Newsgroups: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql