Article View: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql
Article #1519Re: SQL vs. DBF in 5.5a
From: John Fried
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 00:00
14 lines
968 bytes
968 bytes
Bowen, > No, accessing DBFs directly via the BDE with SQL will probably result in > poorer performance. I sure feel better about NOT having used SQL in 5.5 so far. I will now focus my efforts on more efficient coding (see my reply to Keith). > Heck, maybe the net just needs more bandwidth <g>. They are going to try some new network accelerator card. Thanks and Happy Holidays, John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3499A4F8.7CAA@ipass.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<34993B49.11E3@ipass.net> <67buj9$cj77@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ff5a1,80b4f7477494d14b X-Google-Attributes: gidff5a1,public From: John Fried <dataknight@ipass.net> Subject: Re: SQL vs. DBF in 5.5a Date: 1997/12/18 Message-ID: <3499A4F8.7CAA@ipass.net> X-Deja-AN: 299470661 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <34993B49.11E3@ipass.net> <67buj9$cj77@forums.borland.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: dataKnight Software Services Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: dataknight@ipass.net Newsgroups: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql