🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql
Article #1584

Re: SQL Links verses ODBC

#1584
From: Keith G. Chuvala (TeamB)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 00:00
19 lines
1044 bytes
> 1.  Is one faster than the other?

In general you'll find SQL links to be faster

> 2.  Is one less reliable/less buggy than the other?

My impression (my experience is limited to only a couple of platforms)
both work very well.  ODBC, which I use daily, does have some annoying
limitations with the back end I use in my regular work(an AS/400);
native drivers will of course have far better support for unique native
capabilities than ODBC.

> 3.  Is there a difference in the simplicity between them.

Not much.  Both require some setup on the client side.  Neither is
particularly hard.

kgc
Technical Details
Message-ID: <34576521.4C045571@DELETE_THIS.hit.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3455D489.6181@n2.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ff5a1,de7d4ae4baf83009
X-Google-Attributes: gidff5a1,public
From: "Keith G. Chuvala (TeamB)" <kgc@DELETE_THIS.hit.net>
Subject: Re: SQL Links verses ODBC
Date: 1997/10/29
Message-ID: <34576521.4C045571@DELETE_THIS.hit.net>
X-Deja-AN: 285804611
References: <3455D489.6181@n2.net>
Organization: First Intermark Corp.
Newsgroups: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql