🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql
Article #1585

Re: SQL Links verses ODBC

#1585
From: Greg Hill
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 00:00
23 lines
1140 bytes
Keith G. Chuvala (TeamB) wrote:
> 
> > 1.  Is one faster than the other?
> 
> In general you'll find SQL links to be faster
> 
> > 2.  Is one less reliable/less buggy than the other?
> 
> My impression (my experience is limited to only a couple of platforms)
> both work very well.  ODBC, which I use daily, does have some annoying
> limitations with the back end I use in my regular work(an AS/400);
> native drivers will of course have far better support for unique native
> capabilities than ODBC.
> 
> > 3.  Is there a difference in the simplicity between them.
> 
> Not much.  Both require some setup on the client side.  Neither is
> particularly hard.
> 
> kgc

Thank you for your input, Greg
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3456F27D.99C@n2.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3455D489.6181@n2.net> <34576521.4C045571@DELETE_THIS.hit.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ff5a1,de7d4ae4baf83009
X-Google-Attributes: gidff5a1,public
From: Greg Hill <ghill@n2.net>
Subject: Re: SQL Links verses ODBC
Date: 1997/10/29
Message-ID: <3456F27D.99C@n2.net>
X-Deja-AN: 285841778
References: <3455D489.6181@n2.net> <34576521.4C045571@DELETE_THIS.hit.net>
Organization: Serv-U Computers
Newsgroups: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql