Re: Significance of 628 records in INSERT INTO statement

Article View: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql

Article #859

Back to borland.public.vdbase.data.sql Previous Next

#859

From: Christopher F. Neumann
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 00:00

32 lines
1264 bytes

next segment:

    I deleted records 610-630 and packed the table.  I then went as far as
to reboot my machine.  STILL, every 628.

next next segment:

    I changed the routine to:

          set database to HADESTEST
          insert into INVOICE (inv_guarantorid) values('XXX')
          set database to LOCALTEST

NOW, I get a STACK OVERFLOW (error 170).  Any ideas?



Christopher F. Neumann wrote in message <6m6mo1$68k3@forums.borland.com>...
>Rechecked all data, even copied ALL of 625 to 628, still bombs on 628, 1256
>(628 * 2), 1884 (628 * 3), etc.
>
>Is there a memory setting that I am overlooking in BDE?
>
>
>>Christopher F. Neumann
>>
>>"Failure is not an option!"
>>
>>
>
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6m8qq4$7s85@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6m63tr$5bq9@forums.borland.com> <6m6mo1$68k3@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ff5a1,40b0ad00a6b1ddcc,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidff5a1,public
From: "Christopher F. Neumann" <CNeumann@Physix.com>
Subject: Re: Significance of 628 records in INSERT INTO statement
Date: 1998/06/17
Message-ID: <6m8qq4$7s85@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 363556376
References: <6m63tr$5bq9@forums.borland.com> <6m6mo1$68k3@forums.borland.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: Physix, Inc.
Newsgroups: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql

Reply to Parent Message