Article View: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql
Article #860Re: Significance of 628 records in INSERT INTO statement
From: Christopher F. Neumann
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 00:00
38 lines
1429 bytes
1429 bytes
Make that ERROR 148
Christopher F. Neumann wrote in message <6m8qq4$7s85@forums.borland.com>...
>next segment:
>
> I deleted records 610-630 and packed the table. I then went as far as
>to reboot my machine. STILL, every 628.
>
>next next segment:
>
> I changed the routine to:
>
> set database to HADESTEST
> insert into INVOICE (inv_guarantorid) values('XXX')
> set database to LOCALTEST
>
>NOW, I get a STACK OVERFLOW (error 170). Any ideas?
>
>
>
>Christopher F. Neumann wrote in message <6m6mo1$68k3@forums.borland.com>...
>>Rechecked all data, even copied ALL of 625 to 628, still bombs on 628,
1256
>>(628 * 2), 1884 (628 * 3), etc.
>>
>>Is there a memory setting that I am overlooking in BDE?
>>
>>
>>>Christopher F. Neumann
>>>
>>>"Failure is not an option!"
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6m8r5b$7ub4@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6m63tr$5bq9@forums.borland.com> <6m6mo1$68k3@forums.borland.com> <6m8qq4$7s85@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ff5a1,40b0ad00a6b1ddcc X-Google-Attributes: gidff5a1,public From: "Christopher F. Neumann" <CNeumann@Physix.com> Subject: Re: Significance of 628 records in INSERT INTO statement Date: 1998/06/17 Message-ID: <6m8r5b$7ub4@forums.borland.com> X-Deja-AN: 363563696 References: <6m63tr$5bq9@forums.borland.com> <6m6mo1$68k3@forums.borland.com> <6m8qq4$7s85@forums.borland.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Organization: Physix, Inc. Newsgroups: borland.public.vdbase.data.sql