🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4ctug3$o2b@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com>,
Martin J. Bernard III  <stncar@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>In <hatunenDKvK4y.K6x@netcom.com> hatunen@netcom.com (DaveHatunen)
>writes: 
>>
>>In article <4crioe$9ol@cloner3.netcom.com>,
>>Martin J. Bernard III  <stncar@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>In <hatunenDKu99p.7r5@netcom.com> hatunen@netcom.com (DaveHatunen)
>>>writes: 
>>>
>>>>-
>>>>Please go to a decent library and read some of the 1958 Life
>magazine
>>>>ads for the Edsel.
>>>
>>>Come on David, one classic goof doesn't prove anything. 
>>-
>>The New Coke? McRibs?
>>-
>minivans, 4X4s with car comfort, VW Beatles, red beer, microwaves
>
>Examples don't prove anything. 
>
>None of these things have anything to do with the success or failure of
>the Impact.
-
You're having a little trouble with the logic of this, aren't you?
-
And you've now cut the part in the quotes where you (I believe it was)
said advertising woudl do the job, to which I posted counterexamples to
show that advertising didn't always do the job.
-
-- 


    ********** DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@netcom.com) **********
    *               Daly City California                  *
    *   Between San Francisco and South San Francisco     *
    *******************************************************