Article View: ca.environment
Article #6343Re: Electric Cars
From: John Perry
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 1995 00:00
54 lines
2912 bytes
2912 bytes
gregglns@ix.netcom.com (Gregg Lansley) wrote: >dci1@ix.netcom.com(D.C.I. ) wrote: >>In <4bhg7r$2jm@impsets.dash.com> Hilary Lane <hilary@dash.com> writes: >>> >>>I read a short blurb in the NYT about Calif backing away from a >>>requirement that 2 percent of all cars sold in Calif be electrically >>>powered. Since I live in Colorado, I have no more info. What's the >>>scoop on this? Why would Calif back away from this? What are the issues? >>> >>>Thanks for all the help you can give me, or if you can point me in the >>>right direction. Please send email. >> There are just too many engineering >> problems encountered to feasibly >> attain the goals set by politicians. >> The maximum effient battery setup >> will only provide 100 miles of driving >> before need to recharge. A recharge >> takes about four hours. The infra >> structure to accommodate the market >> needs is just not there at this time. >> DCI >> ps: I guess they couldn't get an >> electric cord long enough. :-) >Sure, just recharge the batteries; no pollution at all. Riiight. >Most supporters of electric vehicles never stop to consider where does >the charging current come from? If everybody plugged in their cars >overnight, we'd need a lot more powerplants. These vehicles are >hardly pollution free. >-- >Gregg Where do all of the batteries (lead/acid) go after a 3 year life cycle? -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAy/+pmsAAAEEAK3n95AJse3fuwvM2qBFue28Fu5Rtm8oNEw37sgvHC9eWnqu AhyqgaOhviDHF0G1BJRlxG7P3tuZ84fNV5FPFQPnU81STODS0Lqgovv/KW7a9Vts B7sA5pVOxhtr3QGqGro4HRjxcYHTANNh+Q5AzN6tpo/JZRrC8NbOEJAnoXUFAAUT tCBKb2huIFBlcnJ5IDxqb2hucGVyckBuZXRjb20uY29tPg== =CSoi -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- John Perry Don't forge steel... johnperr@netcom.com use the real stuff.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<nntpuserDK4pv9.9pI@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4bhg7r$2jm@impsets.dash.com> <4bhnqs$knk@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4bi23n$fs1@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <4bi540$5k1@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4bi8et$51e@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,29ef021027e05a95 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 10a942,29ef021027e05a95 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public X-Google-Thread: 10df74,29ef021027e05a95 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: johnperr@netcom.com (John Perry) Subject: Re: Electric Cars Date: 1995/12/25 Message-ID: <nntpuserDK4pv9.9pI@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 122732027 sender: netnews@mork.netcom.com references: <4bhg7r$2jm@impsets.dash.com> <4bhnqs$knk@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4bi23n$fs1@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <4bi540$5k1@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4bi8et$51e@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> organization: Live Oak Computer Consulting newsgroups: ca.environment,alt.california,ca.general