🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ca.environment
Article #6344

Re: Electric Cars

#6344
From: D.C.I.
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 1995 00:00
64 lines
3255 bytes
In <nntpuserDK4pv9.9pI@netcom.com> johnperr@netcom.com (John Perry)
writes: 
>
>gregglns@ix.netcom.com (Gregg Lansley) wrote:
>
>>dci1@ix.netcom.com(D.C.I. ) wrote:
>
>>>In <4bhg7r$2jm@impsets.dash.com> Hilary Lane <hilary@dash.com>
writes: 
>>>>
>>>>I read a short blurb in the NYT about Calif backing away from a
>>>>requirement that 2 percent of all cars sold in Calif be
electrically
>>>>powered. Since I live in Colorado, I have no more info. What's the
>>>>scoop on this? Why would Calif back away from this? What are the
issues?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for all the help you can give me, or if you can point me in
the
>>>>right direction. Please send email.
>
>>>                        There are just too many engineering
>>>                        problems encountered to feasibly
>>>                        attain the goals set by politicians.
>>>                        The maximum effient battery setup 
>>>                        will only provide 100 miles of driving
>>>                        before need to recharge. A recharge 
>>>                        takes about four hours. The infra 
>>>                        structure to accommodate the market
>>>                        needs is just not there at this time.
>
>
>>>                        DCI
>
>>>                        ps: I guess they couldn't get an 
>>>                            electric cord long enough. :-)
>
>>Sure, just recharge the batteries; no pollution at all.  Riiight.
>>Most supporters of electric vehicles never stop to consider where
does
>>the charging current come from?  If everybody plugged in their cars
>>overnight, we'd need a lot more powerplants.  These vehicles are
>>hardly pollution free.
>
>>--
>>Gregg
>
>Where do all of the batteries (lead/acid) go after a 3 year life
>cycle?

                    John,

                    Without using engineering jargon, the 
                    infra structure is the system or the
                    interrelated systems that accommodates
                    such matters, as you point out, as          
                    waste and pollution. Close analysis of
                    the "system" as now being presented to
                    the public is in itself an entropic
                    system. It can not be sustained without
                    some negative impact upon the current
                    system and the environment.

                    DCI
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4bmoh4$agb@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4bhg7r$2jm@impsets.dash.com> <4bhnqs$knk@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4bi23n$fs1@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <4bi540$5k1@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4bi8et$51e@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <nntpuserDK4pv9.9pI@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,29ef021027e05a95
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,29ef021027e05a95
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a942,29ef021027e05a95
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public
From: dci1@ix.netcom.com(D.C.I. )
Subject: Re: Electric Cars
Date: 1995/12/25
Message-ID: <4bmoh4$agb@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 122801684
references: <4bhg7r$2jm@impsets.dash.com> <4bhnqs$knk@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4bi23n$fs1@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <4bi540$5k1@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4bi8et$51e@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <nntpuserDK4pv9.9pI@netcom.com>
organization: Netcom
x-netcom-date: Mon Dec 25  9:54:44 AM PST 1995
newsgroups: ca.environment,alt.california,ca.general