Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology

Article View: ca.environment

Article #7021

#7021

From: Jim Barrett
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 00:00

18 lines
764 bytes

 
 
In ca.politics phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) said: 
 
by car anyway. 
> 
>There are no such hidden costs. Indeed, the money from various auto taxes
has  
>become quite a surplus, with various ploiticians eyeing it for various
non-auto  
>uses, like stupid mass transit subsidies. 
> 
> 
> 
>-- 
 
 
You don't pay the extra cost of health care.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3ptllp$545@tuna.hooked.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <philD90s53.Bs5@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b7b23e3700f6d4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
From: jimbar@tuna.hooked.net (Jim Barrett)
Subject: Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology
Date: 1995/05/23
Message-ID: <3ptllp$545@tuna.hooked.net>
X-Deja-AN: 103152624
references: <philD90s53.Bs5@netcom.com>
organization: hooked
newsgroups: ca.environment

Reply to Parent Message