Article View: ca.environment
Article #7060Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology
From: Jim Barrett
Date: Tue, 16 May 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 16 May 1995 00:00
33 lines
2279 bytes
2279 bytes
In ca.environment dlow@ppg01.sc.hp.com (Danny Low) said: >Humans are a >part of nature and our manipulation of it is a normal part of nature. We build >dams just like beavers build dams. We cannot leave nature alone any more than >beavers can leave it alone because we are both an intrinsic part of nature. >What environmentalists want is to control how humans change nature so it >conforms to their dogma as to how it should be changed. > I deleted all the name calling since it is of no value. It is true that we are all a part of nature. I do want to change the way we interact with nature. I believe that we are better off acting in a less destructive manner. This should make sense from an economic point of view. It seems to make sense that eating food that is grown in one's back yard or at least in one's country is ultimately cheaper and better for the environment than having it shipped across the planet. It makes sense that food that is grown with out pesticides is better for our health and will be more cost effective in the long run. It makes sense that transportation that is achieved efficiently will save money and protect the air and my health. It makes sense that we not destoy the forests so that we can sustain the production of lumber, paper and medicine. Environmentalists and free market advocates should get together and figure out how to solve each other's problems rather than just assuming that they are enemies. It makes no sense in my mind to think that any of us don't want both a healthy environment and a healthy economy.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3pat0o$svb@tuna.hooked.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<642_9504221500@salata.com> <3nc5ki$aik@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <3nchtm$rbs@gw.pacbell.com> <3nepf5$bbu@news.tamu.edu> <fergieD7Kt1H.FC5@netcom.com> <3njam5$b2a@hpscit.sc.hp.com> <fergieD7oJtM.8ut@netcom.com> <3nrqbk$8ul@hpscit.sc.hp.com> <fergie <3p8l26$ack@efn.org><3pal6t$li0@hpscit.sc.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b7b23e3700f6d4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: jimbar@tuna.hooked.net (Jim Barrett) Subject: Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology Date: 1995/05/16 Message-ID: <3pat0o$svb@tuna.hooked.net> X-Deja-AN: 102749952 references: <642_9504221500@salata.com> <3nc5ki$aik@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <3nchtm$rbs@gw.pacbell.com> <3nepf5$bbu@news.tamu.edu> <fergieD7Kt1H.FC5@netcom.com> <3njam5$b2a@hpscit.sc.hp.com> <fergieD7oJtM.8ut@netcom.com> <3nrqbk$8ul@hpscit.sc.hp.com> <fergie <3p8l26$ack@efn.org><3pal6t$li0@hpscit.sc.hp.com> organization: hooked newsgroups: ca.environment