Article View: ca.environment
Article #7527Re: Disaster! (was Cal Desert Bill passes!)
From: Todd Ourston
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 1994 19:18
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 1994 19:18
85 lines
5194 bytes
5194 bytes
Eric Mankin (mankin@mizar.usc.edu) wrote: : I don't know where he lives, but there's an off road vehicle area off : highway 5 south of Gorman, you can go to the Guadalupe dunes, or to : Ocatillo Wells. Are you saying that all of these places have been entirely destroyed by ORVs? If so, what exactly do you mean by that? : There are more. Sorry you don't have one on your : doorstep: if this activity is really important to you, perhaps you : should consider moving closer to one of these parks, or buy some : land and establish a private one. As a matter of fact, there is one (and only one) private park for motorcycle use near me. It is closely monitored by Marin County's various agencies and commissions that are concerned about the ecology and habitat values in the largely undeveloped two-thirds of the county where the park is situated. Although many of the staff members leave no doubt that they dislike the park as a matter of principle, they have been unable to document any environmental damage that would warrant further restrictions or closing it. In fact, they just forked over several tens of thousands of gas tax dollars that are earmarked for maintaining the trails in the park and mitigating damage to the surrounding environment. Your presumption that riding motor vehicles off-road is something that I wish to do is entirely misplaced. I don't own any such vehicles, and I don't have any desire to use them. The point of my request was to focus attention on the cavalier attitude of the previous poster who was quite certain that there were ample opportunities for off-road motorists to do their thing. That is the same sort of nonsense that anti-environmentalists spout off: there's plenty of wildland left, so go somewhere else and let us cut trees, mine minerals, dam streams, build roads, etc., here. Sometimes it helps to inventory these imaginary resources instead of simply assuming that they exist in ample quantity. It helps, too, to be reminded that none of us have a right to run public land as though it were our private property, ignoring the wishes of other segments of the public. If it's public, it needs to be managed with the broad range of public interests in mind. Cooperation, rather than coercion, is the key to longterm protection of our varied interests. : But I'm disturbed by your attitude. You don't deny that ORV's are : destructive to the desert. I don't believe I said that they were, either. : You're saying that, because this : product (an ORV) exists and you have bought one, I'm quite certain that I never said any such thing, because it is patently false and does not reflect anything I believe to be true or relevant to this issue. Why don't you just say what's on your mind instead of trying to twist what I have written into something that I never expressed at all? : you have inherent right to go : destroy land that belongs to all of us, all for the sake of a momentary : adrenaline rush/General Rommel fantasy. I can't help feeling this is : selfish. And I can't help but believe that you are projecting your own selfishness and narrow mindedness onto me. Who the hell are you to tell other members of the public that your preservation and privacy issues are more important than their ways of enjoying the environment? Why should they (or I) respect your wishes at all if you are unwilling to extend the same respect and understanding to others. I am selfish. I what the whole damn planet run my way, and I don't want some whiney, selfish, self-righteous twerp like you getting in my way when I want to enjoy _my_ public land. I'm also respectful of the Golden Rule, and I know better than to expect to have my wishes honored, or even to be able to enjoy my life, if I cop a self-righteous attitude and try to force my selfish interests on others, especially when I want to act them out on _our_ public land. I'm disturbed by your sharply contrasting attitude. To be blunt, I think it is childish and rude and likely to draw strong opposition and disrespect for the very things you would like the public at large to respect and protect. I am consoled by Ed Abbey's suggestion, however. I'm on my way out the door to enjoy myself on some trails--something I do quite frequently. Rest in peace.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37p9uk$nn4@crl6.crl.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!decwrl!nntp.crl.com!crl6.crl.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<pjc.33.2E9C62D2@aloha.net> <mbarton-1410941840230001@mbarton.picosof.com> <37o2oe$48u@crl3.crl.com> <37p0k4$f0h@mizar.usc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,92400604b160c5bc X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-15 12:23:39 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!decwrl!nntp.crl.com!crl6.crl.com!not-for-mail From: ourston@crl.com (Todd Ourston) Newsgroups: ca.environment Subject: Re: Disaster! (was Cal Desert Bill passes!) Date: 15 Oct 1994 12:18:44 -0700 Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access (415) 705-6060 [login: guest] Lines: 85 Message-ID: <37p9uk$nn4@crl6.crl.com> References: <pjc.33.2E9C62D2@aloha.net> <mbarton-1410941840230001@mbarton.picosof.com> <37o2oe$48u@crl3.crl.com> <37p0k4$f0h@mizar.usc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: crl6.crl.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]