🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Sep21.040119.12076@morrow.stanford.edu> mich@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Steven Michnick) writes:
>>Come on now!  What they are doing is destroying property which does not belong
>>to them, and trying to egdanger the lives of loggers.  You are rationalizing
>>the criminal behavior of people who want to control resources by violence 
>>rather than by consent.  These folks are criminals.  It matters not what cause
>>they are comiting their crime in the name of.

>Let me get this straight, you are trying to say that a logging company owns
>a tree that is at least 200 years old?  How did they get there to plant the
>forest?  If they own it they must have planted the trees.  I have trouble
>believing that.......

What a pathetic argument!  I didn't build the computer I am using right now.
Does that mean that I cannot own it?  I did not breed any dogs.  Does that
mean that I cannot own one?  I did not collect interstellar dust into any
planets, does that mean that I cannot own any rocks or land?  

An argument does not consist of just writing the first thing that comes into
your mind on a given subject.  It would be nice if it made sense.

--Brian