🚀 go-pugleaf

And another thing, Mr. Between...  If NRA had endorsed a candidate for
governor that...

1. Voted in Congress for a national 7 day waiting period

2. Voted in Congress FOR the Brady bill

3. As Attorney General, allowed HCI to share his time in
   court to argue IN SUPPORT of a state ban on "assault weapons"

4. Was a co-host for a Center to Prevent Handgun Violence fund raiser
   for Jim Brady

5. Teamed up with anti-gun state legislators to expand "assault
   weapon" restrictions and ban "high-capacity magazines"

6. In his bid for Attorney general, was endorsed by Handgun
   Control, Inc. and rated "F" bv NRA

7. By administrative fiat, extended the state waiting period for
   firearm purchases

8. Opposed an NRA sponsored "crime laboratory reporting bill"

9. Testified against an NRA-sponsored "right to carry" bill and
   helped defeat it

10. Reversed a 5 year position for reasoins of political expediency,
    causing thousands of legally-owned guns to be confiscated

...I suspect you would want very much for GOA or GOC to blow the whistle so
that everyone would know how their rights were being sold down the river.

Well, go ahead, only now you can expose GOA and GOC, because those are ALL
THINGS DAN LUNGREN DID *BEFORE* GOA AND GOC ENDORSED HIM (and NRA refused to
endorse him).

Cheers,

Mike Haas



"betweentheeyes" <betweentheeyes@supportingThe2nd.org> wrote in message
news:OgeF8.93418$fW5.16744157@typhoon.atl.ipsvc.net...
> "Mike Haas" <mike@skyweyr.com><snip>
>
> Mr. Haas, you are just on the other side (bad side) of worthless.
>
> A previous post of yours was positive, on track.  I considered commenting
on
> the nice change in your tone but previous exchanges with you still leave a
> bad taste.
>
> Just who do you believe, will benefit from this post?  NRA?  Think about
it.
>
>