🚀 go-pugleaf

Sam, I notice that, like Mr. Between, you don't disagree with any facts in
the post, either.  Good to have you on board too.

After all, no one could support a pro-gun group that endorsed a candidate
who...

1. Voted in Congress for a national 7 day waiting period

2. Voted in Congress FOR the Brady bill

3. As Attorney General, allowed HCI to share his time in
   court to argue IN SUPPORT of a state ban on "assault weapons"

4. Was a co-host for a Center to Prevent Handgun Violence fund raiser
   for Jim Brady

5. Teamed up with anti-gun state legislators to expand "assault
   weapon" restrictions and ban "high-capacity magazines"

6. In his bid for Attorney general, was endorsed by Handgun
   Control, Inc. and rated "F" bv NRA

7. By administrative fiat, extended the state waiting period for
   firearm purchases

8. Opposed an NRA sponsored "crime laboratory reporting bill"

9. Testified against an NRA-sponsored "right to carry" bill and
   helped defeat it

10. Reversed a 5 year position for reasons of political expediency,
    causing thousands of legally-owned guns to be confiscated

Pretty "compromising" of GOA and GOC to do that, eh?  Thanks for helping me
spread the word.

Mike Haas



"Sam A. Kersh" <sam.a.kersh@us.army.mil> wrote in message
news:u11beuc3o5s42tvv5clvt2kuupr430ura1@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 May 2002 14:49:02 -0700, "Mike Haas" <mike@skyweyr.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Yeah, I know - insult, insult, insult.  It happens all the time someone
> >can't rebut the facts.
>
> So that explains you posts - you're unable to refute true so you attack
> and insult....
>
>
> Sam A. Kersh
> NRA Patron Member
> L.E.A.A. Life Member
> TSRA Life Member
> GOA, JPFO, SAF
> http://www.flash.net/~csmkersh/
> ===============================================================
>
> Read Jeff Snyder's unabridged analysis of the S&W/HUD sellout
> at http://communities.prodigy.net/sportsrec/jeffsnyder.html