Article View: ca.firearms
Article #673"Unsafe Handgun Act" Target for Trial Attorneys
From: Neil At Hollywood�.Hom
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 05:14
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 05:14
256 lines
11992 bytes
11992 bytes
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_060F_01C0B314.E5375360
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http://www.nraila.org/show.cgi?page=3D/news/20010322-BanningGuns-001.shtm=
l
NEWS RELEASE
National Rifle Association=20
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030=20
California Rifle & Pistol Association=20
271 East Imperial Highway, Suite 620 Fullerton, CA 92835=20
Chuck Michel, CRPA Spokesperson: (310)548-0410 =20
March 19, 2001=20
"UNSAFE HANDGUN ACT" TARGET FOR TRIAL ATTORNEYS
Police Face Increased Liability Under New Law
LOS ANGELES - Mr. Chuck Michel, Civil Rights Attorney and =
Spokesperson for the California Rifle & Pistol Association (CRPA), plans =
a statewide talk show tour to discuss the disastrous impact to law =
enforcement of the "Unsafe Handgun Act" signed into law by Governor =
Davis in 1999 as Senate Bill 15 (Polanco) (now Penal Code Section =
12125-12133).=20
SB15 declares every handgun "unsafe" unless it passes a series of =
state mandated performance tests. Because the Act only allows =
manufacturers to submit guns for testing, and because only current =
production handgun models have been submitted by those manufacturers, =
all untested models carried by police departments across the state are =
branded "unsafe" by the law, regardless of their quality and safety =
features. Recently obtained documentation from police departments across =
the state demonstrates that the vast majority of police handguns are =
untested, and indicates that many police firearms used for back up and =
off duty use would not pass even if tested.=20
Although law enforcement agencies are exempt from restrictions on =
buying the guns under the new law, there is no provision immunizing them =
from the increased liability for using those guns.=20
"This creates real liability problems for law enforcement officers =
and agencies," stated Mr. Michel, a former prosecutor. "These firearms =
have been deemed 'unsafe' for law-abiding citizens to own, yet we have =
thousands of law enforcement officers in this state carrying them while =
on the job, off the job, and under cover. The exposure to increased =
liability for damages in the event of an accident is tremendous. Any =
time there is a shooting trial lawyers will point to the gun as the =
cause. In fact, not having these guns safety tested is itself negligent. =
It's like half of a plaintiff's lawyer's work has already been done for =
them by the State Legislature!"=20
In response to a Public Records Act request done at the behest of =
the California Rifle & Pistol Association and the National Rifle =
Association and coordinated by Mr. Michel, police departments across the =
state provided documentation that they have approved the 'unsafe' =
handguns for on duty, off duty, and "backup" use by their officers, and =
that accidental discharges are not uncommon.=20
Mr. Michel has attended seminars that the American Bar Association =
has been hosting where plaintiffs lawyers are taught how to use these =
"unsafe" gun laws to sue successfully and increase liability of gun =
users. "This is a trial attorney's dream," said attorney Michel. "All it =
will take to reek financial havoc on to a city or a county is to have =
one of these guns discharge and hurt someone, if it hasn't happened =
already." # # #=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
See the letter to Sheriff Les Weidman, President, California State =
Sheriffs Association regarding the research results of the Public =
Records Act request.=20
=20
Posted: 2001-03-22 =20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
Having difficulty finding ILA-related info?
Try our FAQ Sheet=20
NRAILA.org is maintained for the NRA by
Mainstream Electronic Information Services.
Homepage established 1994 by the NRA Institute for Legislative Action
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030=20
Copyright 2001, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for =
Legislative Action
This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial =
purposes.=20
------=_NextPart_000_060F_01C0B314.E5375360
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://www.nraila.org/show.cgi?page=3D/news/20010322-BanningGuns-=
001.shtml">http://www.nraila.org/show.cgi?page=3D/news/20010322-BanningGu=
ns-001.shtml</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<TABLE width=3D"100%" border=3D0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD colSpan=3D2>
<CENTER>
<H2>NEWS RELEASE</H2></CENTER>
<TABLE width=3D"100%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3D-2>National Rifle Association <BR>11250 =
Waples Mill=20
Road, Fairfax, VA 22030 <BR></FONT></TD>
<TD align=3Dright><FONT size=3D-2>California Rifle & =
Pistol=20
Association <BR>271 East Imperial Highway, Suite 620 =
Fullerton, CA=20
92835 <BR>Chuck Michel, CRPA Spokesperson: (310)548-0410=20
</FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P align=3Dright><FONT size=3D-1>March 19, 2001</FONT>=20
<CENTER>
<H3>“UNSAFE HANDGUN ACT” TARGET FOR TRIAL =
ATTORNEYS</H3><BR><B>Police Face=20
Increased Liability Under New Law</B></CENTER>
<P>LOS ANGELES - Mr. Chuck Michel, Civil Rights Attorney and =
Spokesperson=20
for the California Rifle & Pistol Association (CRPA), plans a=20
statewide talk show tour to discuss the disastrous impact to law=20
enforcement of the “Unsafe Handgun Act” signed into =
law by Governor Davis=20
in 1999 as Senate Bill 15 (Polanco) (now Penal Code Section =
12125-12133).=20
<P>SB15 declares every handgun “unsafe” unless it =
passes a series of state=20
mandated performance tests. Because the Act only allows =
manufacturers to=20
submit guns for testing, and because only current production =
handgun=20
models have been submitted by those manufacturers, all untested =
models=20
carried by police departments across the state are branded =
“unsafe” by the=20
law, regardless of their quality and safety features. Recently =
obtained=20
documentation from police departments across the state =
demonstrates that=20
the vast majority of police handguns are untested, and indicates =
that many=20
police firearms used for back up and off duty use would not pass =
even if=20
tested.=20
<P>Although law enforcement agencies are exempt from restrictions =
on=20
buying the guns under the new law, there is no provision =
immunizing them=20
from the increased liability for using those guns.=20
<P>“This creates real liability problems for law enforcement =
officers and=20
agencies,” stated Mr. Michel, a former prosecutor. =
“These firearms have=20
been deemed ‘unsafe’ for law-abiding citizens to own, =
yet we have=20
thousands of law enforcement officers in this state carrying them =
while on=20
the job, off the job, and under cover. The exposure to increased =
liability=20
for damages in the event of an accident is tremendous. Any time =
there is a=20
shooting trial lawyers will point to the gun as the cause. In =
fact, not=20
having these guns safety tested is itself negligent. It’s =
like half of a=20
plaintiff’s lawyer’s work has already been done for =
them by the State=20
Legislature!”=20
<P>In response to a Public Records Act request done at the behest =
of the=20
California Rifle & Pistol Association and the National Rifle=20
Association and coordinated by Mr. Michel, police departments =
across the=20
state provided documentation that they have approved the =
‘unsafe’ handguns=20
for on duty, off duty, and “backup” use by their =
officers, and that=20
accidental discharges are not uncommon.=20
<P>Mr. Michel has attended seminars that the American Bar =
Association has=20
been hosting where plaintiffs lawyers are taught how to use these =
“unsafe”=20
gun laws to sue successfully and increase liability of gun users. =
“This is=20
a trial attorney’s dream,” said attorney Michel. =
“All it will take to reek=20
financial havoc on to a city or a county is to have one of these =
guns=20
discharge and hurt someone, if it hasn’t happened =
already.” # # #=20
<P>
<HR>
<P>See the <A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.nraila.org/statelocal/20010321-BanningGuns-001.shtml">=
letter=20
to <I>Sheriff Les Weidman</A>, <B>President,</I> California State =
Sheriffs=20
Association</B> regarding the research results of the Public =
Records Act=20
request. </P></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT size=3D-3>Posted: 2001-03-22</FONT></TD>
<TD align=3Dright></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P></P>
<CENTER>
<P>
<HR noShade SIZE=3D1>
<FONT size=3D-2>Having difficulty finding ILA-related info?<BR>Try our =
<A=20
href=3D"http://www.nraila.org/grassroots/19990813-GeneralInfo-015.html">F=
AQ=20
Sheet</A>=20
<P>NRAILA.org is maintained for the NRA by<BR></FONT><A=20
href=3D"http://www.mainstream.net/"><FONT size=3D-2>Mainstream =
Electronic=20
Information Services</FONT></A><FONT size=3D-2><A=20
href=3D"http://www.nraila.org/archive.shtml">.</A></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D-2>Homepage established 1994 by the NRA Institute for =
Legislative=20
Action<BR>11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030=20
<P>Copyright 2001, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for=20
Legislative Action<BR>This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced =
for=20
commercial purposes. </P>
<P></FONT> </P></CENTER></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_060F_01C0B314.E5375360--
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<LYAu6.2690$P4.204508@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a039,6a4b91c66b2cab3d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10a039,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-22 21:16:03 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Neil At Hollywood�.Hom" <replyfromyou@spam.email.com> Newsgroups: ca.firearms Subject: "Unsafe Handgun Act" Target for Trial Attorneys Lines: 257 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_060F_01C0B314.E5375360" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: <LYAu6.2690$P4.204508@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 05:14:19 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.179.232.161 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 985324459 209.179.232.161 (Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:14:19 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:14:19 PST Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net