🚀 go-pugleaf

gibson@bmrl.med.uiuc.edu (T. Mark Gibson) writes:

> jzero@netcom.com (Jim Nakamura) writes:

> >johann_opitz@smtp.esl.com (Big O) writes:

> >> In article <jzeroCxLxKs.Hxw@netcom.com>, jzero@netcom.com (Jim Nakamura) wrote:

> >> >|         And you're a Nazi.

> >> Jim,

> >> You don't have the foggiest idea what Nazism and Fascism is  --  you've
> >> just been very well trained by your socialist handlers to use those labels
> >> on any thing that is to the right of you without any realization that
> >> Nazism and Fascism are just as much part of the socialist family of
> >> social-economic politics as is Communism.

> >> The left, since the 1930s, has always called anything to the right of them
> >> as Nazism and Fascism, yet the methodology of all of these forms of
> >> statism is nearly identical on all counts.  While there are some
> >> differences between Nazism/Fascism and Communism and every type of
> >> socialism in between, they all fit the definition of statism very well and
> >> from a distance they look nearly identical over time.

> >> Some people just can't see the forest for the trees -- and they don't want
> >> to, either.


> >	Let me get this straight.  You can call me a fascist
> >	but I can't call you a nazi?  I'll keep calling you
> >	a nazi until you stop calling me a fascist.  And if 
> >	you call me a statist, I'll call you a supremacist.

> You can call him a nazi, but you're obviously lying when you do so.  He is
> absolutely correct in describing you as a fascist or a statist, since your
> messages are those of a fascist statist.

> Actually, you have a lot in common with Nazis.  Remember, "Nazi" was short
> for "National Socialist Party" and you have proven yourself to be a rabid
> socialist.

	Also, remember that the National Socialists were enemies
	of the Communist Party, and in fact of all socialists.

-- 
jzero@netcom.com