🚀 go-pugleaf

cramer@optilink.dsccc.com (Clayton Cramer) writes:

> In article <jzeroCxLww6.HDJ@netcom.com>, Jim Nakamura <jzero@netcom.com> wrote:
> >cramer@optilink.dsccc.com (Clayton Cramer) writes:
> >> In article <jzeroCxCu5D.2Hr@netcom.com>, Jim Nakamura <jzero@netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >	These guys whine about paying for universal insurance
> >> >	but ignore the costs of an overly liberal interpretation
> >> >	of the Second Amendment.  I don't think the common
> >> >	populace qualifies as a "militia".  Everytime some
> >
> >> Under 10 USC 311, yes it does.  In any case, the Second Amendment
> >> doesn't say, "right of the militia" and nearly every court decision
> >> in the history of this country has recognized that an individual
> >> right is protected by the Second Amendment.
> >
> >	Acts of Congress are pretty easily changed.

> The Constitution is not, however.


	Sure it is.  It's just a matter of reinterpretation.


> >> GOING to have?  A little late, isn't?  We have quite a bit already,
> >> and it has been completely inefective.
> >
> >> There's no question that high crime rates are bad for everyone.
> >> But I don't hear you liberals/fascists pushing for bans on
> >> homosexuality because of uninsured AIDS cases.  Oh, and you
> >> liberals/fascists already banned IV drug abuse, the other major
> >> source of AIDS cases.
> >
> >	How do you regulate private sexual acts?  It's
> >	cheaper and easier to regulate firearms.
> >-- 
> >jzero@netcom.com

> How do you regulate private sexual acts?  About the same way you
> regulate firearms.  You pass laws, and then when you find that 
> the law is being ignored, you make the penalties more and more
> Draconian.

> Seriously, if the media went on a campaign to ban homosexuality
> comparable to the one they are engaged in against guns, homosexuality
> would be a crime, homosexuals engaging in public displays of affection
> would be arrested and locked up, and the schools would distribute
> anti-homosexual materials, instead of pro-homosexual materials.

> Would the government succeed?  No, of course not.  It would work
> as well as gun control laws do.


	So you oppose banning homosexual activity?
	Is it possible you're really a liberal deep
	down inside?


-- 
jzero@netcom.com