Article View: ca.general
Article #21292Re: California Democrats
From: Janice Fahey
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 1994 17:05
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 1994 17:05
46 lines
2960 bytes
2960 bytes
Al Date wrote: AD>Just because you are uninsured does not mean that you cannot afford AD>medical care! The vast majority of uninsured Americans are employed. AD>I have several self-employed friends who make much more than I do, AD>who just take their chances, and if they get hurt or sick they just AD>run it up on their VISA at the local clinic. They tell me that it AD>is MUCH cheaper than buying insurance. It's kind of funny, in AD>a sick way, because here they are, cutting the cost of medical service AD>to themselves and, by extension, to the populace as a whole, AD>by cutting out the middleman and self-insuring, and some AD>intervention-minded Santa Claus-believing statistics-bending AD>policy wonk finds out about them by looking at the data, and AD>he comes to the conclusion that the system is so messed AD>up that we need a Health Czar to straighten it all out! Like your friends, we were young and healthy, and self-employed. Our daughter was born 12 weeks early. The prognosois was good, and she's healthy and bright today, but her medical bills were over $300k. That was 11 years ago. I can't guess what it would cost today. We were thankful to have insurance coverage. Even the 20% deductible just about killed us. Had we been self-insured, we would not have been able to pay these bills. The costs would have been absorbed by by the taxpayers, and by insured patients. To be *self-insured* is to be dependent on public funds in the event of catastrophic illness--unless one has very deep pockets. I think your friends would max out their VISA cards fast if they were unlucky enough to become seriously ill. Cancer happens. AIDS happens. And so do a number of less fatal, but still expensive medical problems. Our professional group insurance rates went up astronomically the year following my daughter's birth (guess why?). The increase in insurance cost was a major factor shutting down our small business. Our current coverage is an HMO. We don't have a meaningful choice about who our doctors are. We don't have a "relationship" with a doctor. We do get acceptable care and a reasonable level of service. I don't think we have much to loose if Prop 186 passes, except the fear of losing coverage. My point is that your affluent friends may be saving themselves some money, but we--the taxpayers and insured--are assuming their risk, and it's costing us money.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<940928204314475@friendz.cts.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!crash!friendz!janice.faheyShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,22c2e8f2ea653e21,start X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-30 17:45:16 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!crash!friendz!janice.fahey From: janice.fahey@friendz.cts.com (Janice Fahey) Newsgroups: ca.general Subject: Re: California Democrats Date: Wed, 28 Sep 1994 17:05:00 GMT Message-ID: <940928204314475@friendz.cts.com> Organization: Friendz BBS (619) 222-1099 Distribution: world Lines: 47