Re: Ripped off by Lousy DAYTEK Monitor

Article View: can.consumers

Article #2152

#2152

From: Mike Frisch
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 00:00

14 lines
1054 bytes

In article <5agmk5$qm4@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca>, weijunli@bmerh1a9.bnr.ca (Weijun Lee) wrote:
>DAYTEK, lousy monitor!!!

Yep...  You get what you pay for and this is one of those brands which 
I'd strongly recommend against.  Add AOC to that this as well...

Mike.


======================================================================
Mike Frisch                               Email: mfrisch@rogerswave.ca
Northstar Technologies                 WWW: http://www.io.org/~mfrisch
Newmarket, Ontario, CANADA

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5bmlqg$hc0@bart.rogerswave.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <5agmk5$qm4@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,fdeaeb9f065f928f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public
X-Google-Thread: 114977,fdeaeb9f065f928f
X-Google-Attributes: gid114977,public
From: mfrisch@rogerswave.ca (Mike Frisch)
Subject: Re: Ripped off by Lousy DAYTEK Monitor
Date: 1997/01/17
Message-ID: <5bmlqg$hc0@bart.rogerswave.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 210327365
distribution: world
references: <5agmk5$qm4@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca>
organization: Rogers Cablesystems Ltd.
newsgroups: can.consumers,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video

Reply to Parent Message