Re: Proxy Voting by Society Members

Article View: can.org.cips

Article #5

From: Tom Ruta
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 00:00

7 lines
895 bytes

Ken Chapman <chapmank@ucalgary.ca> wrote:
..
>As you know, the procedures for the SGM were approved by the National Board.
Care to comment as to why those procedures  appear to
contrary to RRoO?

Tom

Technical Details

Message-ID: <36cec2f8.44627441@news.supernews.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <19990220.073541.17986@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f56b1,61c58ec96ab56b69
X-Google-Attributes: gidf56b1,public
From: rutat@cadvision.com (Tom Ruta)
Subject: Re: Proxy Voting by Society Members
Date: 1999/02/20
Message-ID: <36cec2f8.44627441@news.supernews.com>
X-Deja-AN: 446399955
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <19990220.073541.17986@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com
X-Trace: 919519218 YAEMDGF8R715DCFE4 usenet43.supernews.com
Organization: Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - Discussions start here!
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: rutat@cadvision.com
Newsgroups: can.org.cips

Reply to Parent Message