Thread View: can.org.cips
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by C & L Whitfield
Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:00
Re: Ottawa SGM
Author: C & L Whitfield
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:00
45 lines
2748 bytes
2748 bytes
[As proof that it is time to move on on this subject I inadvertently sent this note which was intended as a CIPS-L note as a reply to a personal communication so I am going ahead and resending the substance to the list] > >.... all CIPS members who monitor this list. > >I supect that the absence of the normal level of traffic on the list is a signal to me and others that (for many different reasons) people are ready (maybe way past ready) to move on and give this issue a rest and that is what I intend to do. Unless my determination fails me this will be my last posting on this list on this subject. > >I leave with these comments excerpted from other conversations in other forums. > > I believe,..., that the SGM should be taken as a "new beginning" -- not as an end. I am pleased with the thrust of the message received from Kewal that was sent to individual members. I really hope that the board can convey a genuine regret that this whole situation occurred and send a genuine message of reconciliation to those who feel "rejected"or "disenfranchised" by the vote .. in my view [there] needs to be a focussed and concentrated effort to go after each & every one of those members and deal with them as individuals.(There is a major role for the Regional directors >here and I think it comes with the territory of them having accepted this >role). I believe that each one [of those who feel CIPS have let them down] has their own issues and concerns and any attempt to lump into a category will fail. Even an effort like the one I suggest may have a low success rate but I believe it is essential that it be done. > >... for me the real test of CIPS is what happens over the next 12 months and [answering the question whether] the board [has] learned anything from this -- despite the support in the vote will they accept that they are 100% accountable [for the situation] and will they take genuine, positive action to make the changes that would prevent this from ever happening again? > >I am willing to communicate "off-line" in direct exchanges with anyone who feels so inclined but as mentioned I think it is time for CIPS-L to "give it a rest" > >Best regards - Charlie Whitfield >> >> <snipped>
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads