🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: capdist.misc
Article #681

Re: Do Albany Area ISPs Compete...or Conspire?

#681
From: Daniel A. Norton
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 00:00
62 lines
2660 bytes
In <4utf7c$10t@lori.albany.net> maz@magik.albany.net (Matthew Zahorik)
wrote:
>Daniel A. Norton (danorton@albany.net) wrote:
>
>: This isn't a list between techies at the various companies -- it's
>: between the _Presidents_.
>
>Wrong.
>
>Do a who albany-isp before making accusations.

I wasn't making an accusation, Matt, I was quoting you:

In <Pine.SUN.3.93.960804003032.10734R-100000@magik.albany.net> Matthew
Zahorik <maz@albany.net> wrote:
>It's a private list..  I leave it open for vital matters between
>presidents of the various local ISPs, with no noise.

In <4utf7c$10t@lori.albany.net> maz@magik.albany.net (Matthew Zahorik)
wrote:
>It's mostly between the operational staff of the different orginizations.

Now, you are contradicting yourself, Matt.

>Exactly.  And you're using bombast and hysteria, along with false
>allusions to collusionary activities.

No, Matt, your own statements are doing all of the work for me.

>If we did something to collude to try to do something, like
>raising prices, what would prevent our customers from migrating to an
>out-of-the-area provider?

So local ISPs can collude up to the $2-3/hr ceiling of national
providers?

>I created the list for that purpose.  To make it *easy* for albany area
>ISP to communicate, and cooperate in ways that are beneficial to 
>customers.  (fairs, regional peering, ways to improve systems, how to
>combat abuse, streamline accounting, etc)

OK, Matt, I'll take your word for it.  Your word is good enough for me.
But answer me this: Why should this stuff be private??

>A good number of these things, if we had to be sensitive to how every word
>could be interpeted and perceived by the general public, would be left
>unsaid.

Boy, wouldn't business be easier if you didn't have to deal with
_customers_!

>Conspiracy has the novel attribute of being nearly impossible to disprove
>and is oft used to shore up an argument that lacks substance and/or
>reasonable cause.

Oh, it's very easy to disprove, Matt.  What's curious is your
unwillingness to do so.

--
Daniel A. Norton
danorton@albany.net
Technical Details
Message-ID: <321334f1.80170626@news.albany.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3211dd28.39089026@news.albany.net> <4utf7c$10t@lori.albany.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110b47,4662656a8b9f04dd
X-Google-Attributes: gid110b47,public
From: danorton@albany.net (Daniel A. Norton)
Subject: Re: Do Albany Area ISPs Compete...or Conspire?
Date: 1996/08/15
Message-ID: <321334f1.80170626@news.albany.net>
X-Deja-AN: 174400674
distribution: na
references: <3211dd28.39089026@news.albany.net> <4utf7c$10t@lori.albany.net>
followup-to: capdist.misc
organization: New York's Capital District Page
newsgroups: capdist.misc