Article View: chi.internet
Article #336Re: more updates
From: Eric
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 16:49
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 16:49
83 lines
5221 bytes
5221 bytes
Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> wrote in news:jjflps$a7k$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com: > > I don't remember what the original thread was, or even if it was in > here (chi.internet) but I posted a message a couple months ago about > receiving a letter from ATT about having 45 days to contact them to > change my dsl service to uverse. > > At that time, after getting transfered to 3 different departments, it > ended up with them telling me to toss the letter because there is no > uverse in this area and no projections when it would be available. > > Well, well, well. > > I still have been getting "your time is running out" letters with one > arriving the other day saying if I don't get this changed by 3/23, the > internet service will be turned off as a warning and will be totally > disconnected (becoming an ex-customer) by 4/3. > > So I tried calling the number again and got a slightly different story > this time. What it sounds like to me, uverse availability or not, they > do want to move the old dsl customers to uverse, which basically > involves not being billed on your phone service anymore. > > Instead it being charged to your home phone service, they actually set > up a new account from att/uverse, new account number and the > dsl/internet service is removed from your monthly phone bill. > > They still need to have someone come out to replace the modem/router, > which they didn't have any information on, it's mandatory for "S" > customers, the ones on static addressing, and whatever "professional" > they are sending, is supposed to be here next tuesday, the 13th. > > The only thing they had for hard-core facts was pricing, currently I'm > paying $70 a month for 6mb/784kb and 5 usable static addresses, the > service level stays the same but the price drops to $19.95 + $15 for > the statics for the first 12 months ($34.95). That also increases the > bandwidth cap from 150gb a month to 250gb. > > After the 1st year, it goes up to some goofy amount like $53.72 > including the statics, so it's still about $17 cheaper a month. > > But that was it, they had no clue if my current ip addresses would be > carried over, new ones issued or what the story is. Also, besides > telling me it's not the same router they give to residential, they had > no info about it either. Make, model, features, nothing. But there is > no "self install" for it, they have to send out a "professional > installer" to put it in. > > They ate the costs of the replacement router, the service call and all > other fees. It's just a new account number for the dsl and a reduction > in rates. > > The only plan I have is before the installer does anything, make sure > he has the list of ip's, paperwork for the router and who to call for > the reverse dns updates. They missing any of those, I'm going to send > him packing with a customer cancellation and risk losing the service > later. It's going to be a lot of work changing everything to new ip's > around here and I don't need a tech that can get all green lights > saying he's done, leaving me hanging. > > Thats what happened in Jan of 2002 when I first ordered the dsl with > static addresses, back then it was like a $200 service charge for > "professional installation", not optional. Fucker came in, plugged the > power pack in, hooked the phone line up to the router and called it a > day when it synced up. When I asked him about the static addresses, he > didn't know anything about it and suggested I call some 1-800 for any > questions about them. > > It's still stupid but they have something up their sleeve with this > billing change, which is really all it comes down to. I had to switch to Uverse DSL to get Elite at work. The guy they sent out was competent though he wasn't aware the modem they sent me had Wireless N on board and offered to set up my seperate router for me. To his credit I found out it was a new modem to them, and he was offering to do more as I was the last call of the day and if he called in that he was done, he'd get another install. -- Coming to you from the beautiful Chicago suburbs
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<XnsA0126E0C0BCDCVRI@66.246.138.5>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni10691pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<jjflps$a7k$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,db9186cce635594f
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.135.231 with SMTP id pv7mr5883693pbb.8.1331398201872;
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:50:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h9ni10691pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric <ericw2000@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: more updates
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 16:49:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: VRI
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <XnsA0126E0C0BCDCVRI@66.246.138.5>
References: <jjflps$a7k$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1331398201 22009 66.246.138.5 (10 Mar 2012 16:50:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 16:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Received-Bytes: 4799