Article View: chi.internet
Article #366Re: random update
From: Eric
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:55
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:55
51 lines
3226 bytes
3226 bytes
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote in news:j9t1m6$4ee$1@news.albasani.net: > dye <dye11@adsl-64-108-194-61.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net> wrote: >>Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote: >>>Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> wrote: >>>>dye <dye@adsl-64-108-194-61.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net> wrote: > >>>>>At the time, chicagonet.net didn't detect two 64k connections, >>>>>so I got all the computers in the network 128K access for >>>>>$15/month....a bit of an improvement over 40k "dialout" > >>>>Hmm, that doesn't sound right. > >>>>Maybe they didn't detect it but must of permitted it, the channel >>>>bonding for ISDN was mostly an option to support, I don't think it >>>>was "on" by default with most hardware. > >>>>Besides the profile to support the bonding, the stuff we used >>>>(livingston and 3com) I think used a stock profile setting >>>>"Line-Limit=1" so if someone borrowed someone elses login and tried >>>>to use it, both connections were dropped. > >>>>I'm just saying, was probably more intentional than accidental. > >>>>Maybe they outsourced. > >>>I think I used chicagonet if it was the NT (really) based ISP that >>>just rented dialup pool connections from level3 or something like >>>that. > >>>lots of those places really didn't know if you had both channels up. >>>It took RCN years to notice I (and everybody) was doing that. > >>They had two different price plans, so not intentional. I seem to >>remember my one data line being "dialed out" most of the time. >>Since it was a "Band A" call, it was 5 cents, untimed. > > Timed data call is the stupidity that prevented ISDN from being more > widely deployed and kept numerous people on modems who would have > bought digital service instead. That's what killed it for me. First couple of phone bills were outrageous, so we dropped it. Yes, it was a business line. To add insult to injury, my rep signed me up for completelink at the time so I got a discount based on an agreed amount of volume, that came from the ISDN call estimates. After the year was up I got a bill for $700. -- Coming to you from the beautiful Chicago suburbs
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Xns9F9E64F5A7688VRI@66.246.138.5>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h5ni57813pba.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<j90r22$8bm$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j9dqdh$heb$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j9envk$6v0$1@reader1.panix.com> <j9rqmf$asn$1@dont-email.me> <j9t1m6$4ee$1@news.albasani.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,e2d62a2a0578b92b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.15.41 with SMTP id u9mr26026734pbc.3.1321372801936;
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:00:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h5ni57813pba.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric <ericw2000@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: random update
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:55:29 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: VRI
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <Xns9F9E64F5A7688VRI@66.246.138.5>
References: <j90r22$8bm$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j9dqdh$heb$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j9envk$6v0$1@reader1.panix.com> <j9rqmf$asn$1@dont-email.me> <j9t1m6$4ee$1@news.albasani.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1321372801 3631 66.246.138.5 (15 Nov 2011 16:00:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25