Article View: chi.internet
Article #417Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
From: Cydrome Leader
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 04:00
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 04:00
29 lines
2668 bytes
2668 bytes
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: > Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote: >>Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: >>>Michele Goudie <dont.even@trythisathome.com> wrote: >>>>On 5/25/2012 6:15 AM, Bruce Esquibel wrote: >>>>>Michele Goudie<dont.even@trythisathome.com> wrote: > >>>>>Just curious if your 10% went over 6mb from the normal fastest dsl >>>>>or if was just some slower speed that picked up a bit for no reason. > >>>>It would be the latter. Things were maxing out around 3mb, now it's >>>>pushing 340k with some bursts up to 360k. I'm not the one in charge of >>>>the DSL around here, so I have no idea if we're capped or if we're stuck >>>>with slow speeds in general. > >>>>Never think to ask because the DSL's rarely under heavy use and there's >>>>no streaming video going on except from the intranet. > >>>sounds like you have the "marketing" uverse like bruce does as opposed to >>>anything coming out of one of those VRAD boxes. > >>maybe this explains the normal sized modems and the 1970s sized piece of >>shit I have. "real" uverse people get the stupid sized device? > > Yes. My friend is in a Real U-verse area. I'm in a Fake U-verse area. > We both have the same device you have. So real and fake uverse people al get the large stupid device? Bruce has a normal sized device though.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jq1hk0$ppn$5@reader1.panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni60910pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!panix.com!presenceReferences:
<jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <gZOdnZ9Lp9tBwl3SnZ2dnUVZ5gKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnjs1o71.6rs.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <jprl9g$b8g$2@reader1.panix.com> <jprt4k$2fd$4@news.albasani.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,921f0f40a1d2db04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.241.98 with SMTP id wh2mr8183890pbc.7.1338264001150;
Mon, 28 May 2012 21:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni60910pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!panix.com!presence
From: Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 04:00:00 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <jq1hk0$ppn$5@reader1.panix.com>
References: <jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <gZOdnZ9Lp9tBwl3SnZ2dnUVZ5gKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnjs1o71.6rs.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <jprl9g$b8g$2@reader1.panix.com> <jprt4k$2fd$4@news.albasani.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix1.panix.com
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1338264000 26423 166.84.1.1 (29 May 2012 04:00:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 04:00:00 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/5.1.2 (i386))