🚀 go-pugleaf

Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote:
>Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote:
>>>Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote:
>>>>Michele Goudie <dont.even@trythisathome.com> wrote:
>>>>>On 5/25/2012 6:15 AM, Bruce Esquibel wrote:
>>>>>>Michele Goudie<dont.even@trythisathome.com>  wrote:

>>>>>>Just curious if your 10% went over 6mb from the normal fastest dsl
>>>>>>or if was just some slower speed that picked up a bit for no reason.

>>>>>It would be the latter.  Things were maxing out around 3mb, now it's 
>>>>>pushing 340k with some bursts up to 360k.  I'm not the one in charge of 
>>>>>the DSL around here, so I have no idea if we're capped or if we're stuck 
>>>>>with slow speeds in general.

>>>>>Never think to ask because the DSL's rarely under heavy use and there's 
>>>>>no streaming video going on except from the intranet.

>>>>sounds like you have the "marketing" uverse like bruce does as opposed to
>>>>anything coming out of one of those VRAD boxes.

>>>maybe this explains the normal sized modems and the 1970s sized piece of 
>>>shit I have. "real" uverse people get the stupid sized device?

>>Yes. My friend is in a Real U-verse area. I'm in a Fake U-verse area.
>>We both have the same device you have.

>So real and fake uverse people al get the large stupid device? Bruce has a 
>normal sized device though.

We won't mention that he's been without service since the 4th and how
many times AT&T has been out there.