🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: chi.internet
Article #507

Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse

#507
From: Geoff Gass
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 18:22
35 lines
2638 bytes
smr <me@shawnritchie.com> wrote:
> On 5/24/2012 12:19 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>> dye<dye11@adsl-64-108-195-217.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net>  wrote:
>>
>>> Recently, I had my DSL Elite bill go up to 43 dollars, and in calls to
>>> customer billing and finally customer retention, both of them
>>> tried to get me to switch to Uverse, which surprised me since Uverse
>>> isn't in Park Ridge (TV Uverse, at least - WOW and Comcrap are the
>>> only companies w/the franchise in PR.) . . .
>>
>>> I forgot to ask him if my voice sevice would be analog over the
>>> single pair, or converted to VOIP on the modem.
>>
>> I got forcibly converted to Uverse from DSL, which I didn't want. Like you,
>> I'm in a "fake" Uverse area.
>>
>> I still have my analog telephone line.
>>
>> A friend just had Uverse installed. His neighborhood has real Uverse; I've
>> seen the VRADs. However, he just got data (they wouldn't give him
>> old-fashioned DSL). He kept his analog telephone line, too.
>>
>> So, for the moment, subscribers aren't yet forced to convert to Uverse VoIP.
>>
>> When I had DSL, it was billed to my home phone bill. Uverse is billed
>> separately.
>
> They've been slowly wiring up a VRAD behind my place for the last two 
> months. I'm curious to see what flavor of U-Verse they're actually going 
> to offer out of it.

you'll have everything available.  They're still AT&T though, so it's
nickel-and-dime for everything.  when I went on their website and spec'ed
out what I wanted, the nickel-and-diming added a shitload to the advertised
rates.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <slrnjrsv34.gkq.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni42674pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
References: <jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <jpkgdr$110$5@news.albasani.net> <jples6$6hr$1@ftupet.ftupet.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,921f0f40a1d2db04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.191.225 with SMTP id hb1mr7918907pbc.5.1337884204749;
        Thu, 24 May 2012 11:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni42674pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 18:22:28 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Enjoy the Ftupetemic!
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <slrnjrsv34.gkq.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com>
References: <jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <jpkgdr$110$5@news.albasani.net>
 <jples6$6hr$1@ftupet.ftupet.com>
Reply-To: glg@tanzenmb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1337884087 13042 66.246.138.5 (24 May 2012 18:28:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 18:28:07 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-16 (Linux)