Article View: chi.internet
Article #543Re: random update
From: Cydrome Leader
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:21
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:21
52 lines
3811 bytes
3811 bytes
smr <me@shawnritchie.com> wrote: > On 11/6/2011 1:54 PM, Cydrome Leader wrote: >> Adam H. Kerman<ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>> Bruce Esquibel<bje@ripco.com> wrote: >>>> Adam H. Kerman<ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I really think once Uverse is "mostly available", the DSL is going to end up >>>> where ISDN is now, a legacy service that few of their people are going to >>>> know about it. >>> >>> I would have loved ISDN, but AT&T fucked it up so it never became a >>> ubiquitous service unless you were provisioning a PBX. >> >> The only problem with ISDN it was really quite pointless to anybody that >> never had it. It was never going to be a hit, with anybody. >> >> The same type of idiots that made LDAP came up with ISDN as a solution to >> a problem that never existed. Like anything from a committee with no real >> technical skills or real life experience, it was far too complex and >> offered nothing anybody really wanted. >> >> Unless people with pulse dial phones and party lines were really itching >> to get 3 frames per minute video conferencing, or to have to lease another >> terminal adapter to connect to their leased telephone, class I fax machine >> and credit card terminal. >> >> Sadly, the committee or whoever that came up with ISDN seemed to think >> these were the people that would want it. So obviously since nobody aside >> from 14 businesses used it, it was hard to get for anybody else. >> >> I lived at one place that I wanted ISDN at. AT&T said my CO had no capable >> switch, but they could run the line over from another CO for only >> $285/month or something weird like that. > > It never offered enough of an increase over dialup to be feasible as a > hot product. To get any appreciable speed increase you had to have > 2-channel anyways. > > That said, I had dual ISDN at home for years when I couldn't get DSL due > to CO distance factors. It was the only better-than-dialup option I had. > > What really sucked was when it had trouble and I had to grind through a > few field techs until I found the one out of 100 that had actually heard > of ISDN and knew what to do with it. Any of my calls about ordering ISDN caused massive confusion after that TEAM-DATA number went away, since it wasn't a consumer service and I wasn't a business either. It seemed like it was some bastard service nobody directly sold or supported. I still laugh when I see circuits with IBZD on them usually with an Ameritech logo-ed tag.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<j990i1$le4$3@reader1.panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h5ni9182pba.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!panix!panix.com!presenceReferences:
<j90r22$8bm$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j937m7$rq1$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j942lp$5ea$1@news.albasani.net> <j95r6g$fjf$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j96n4m$l6u$6@news.albasani.net> <j96olo$c6s$1@reader1.panix.com> <j96vi7$5e8$1@ftupet.ftupet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,e2d62a2a0578b92b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.59.229 with SMTP id c5mr36205pbr.6.1320682881906;
Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:21:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h5ni9182pba.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!panix!panix.com!presence
From: Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: random update
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:21:21 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <j990i1$le4$3@reader1.panix.com>
References: <j90r22$8bm$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j937m7$rq1$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j942lp$5ea$1@news.albasani.net> <j95r6g$fjf$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j96n4m$l6u$6@news.albasani.net> <j96olo$c6s$1@reader1.panix.com> <j96vi7$5e8$1@ftupet.ftupet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix1.panix.com
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1320682881 21956 166.84.1.1 (7 Nov 2011 16:21:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:21:21 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/5.1 (i386))