Article View: chi.internet
Article #544Re: random update
From: smr
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:43
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:43
60 lines
4192 bytes
4192 bytes
On 11/7/2011 10:21 AM, Cydrome Leader wrote: > smr<me@shawnritchie.com> wrote: >> On 11/6/2011 1:54 PM, Cydrome Leader wrote: >>> Adam H. Kerman<ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>> Bruce Esquibel<bje@ripco.com> wrote: >>>>> Adam H. Kerman<ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I really think once Uverse is "mostly available", the DSL is going to end up >>>>> where ISDN is now, a legacy service that few of their people are going to >>>>> know about it. >>>> >>>> I would have loved ISDN, but AT&T fucked it up so it never became a >>>> ubiquitous service unless you were provisioning a PBX. >>> >>> The only problem with ISDN it was really quite pointless to anybody that >>> never had it. It was never going to be a hit, with anybody. >>> >>> The same type of idiots that made LDAP came up with ISDN as a solution to >>> a problem that never existed. Like anything from a committee with no real >>> technical skills or real life experience, it was far too complex and >>> offered nothing anybody really wanted. >>> >>> Unless people with pulse dial phones and party lines were really itching >>> to get 3 frames per minute video conferencing, or to have to lease another >>> terminal adapter to connect to their leased telephone, class I fax machine >>> and credit card terminal. >>> >>> Sadly, the committee or whoever that came up with ISDN seemed to think >>> these were the people that would want it. So obviously since nobody aside >>> from 14 businesses used it, it was hard to get for anybody else. >>> >>> I lived at one place that I wanted ISDN at. AT&T said my CO had no capable >>> switch, but they could run the line over from another CO for only >>> $285/month or something weird like that. >> >> It never offered enough of an increase over dialup to be feasible as a >> hot product. To get any appreciable speed increase you had to have >> 2-channel anyways. >> >> That said, I had dual ISDN at home for years when I couldn't get DSL due >> to CO distance factors. It was the only better-than-dialup option I had. >> >> What really sucked was when it had trouble and I had to grind through a >> few field techs until I found the one out of 100 that had actually heard >> of ISDN and knew what to do with it. > > Any of my calls about ordering ISDN caused massive confusion after that > TEAM-DATA number went away, since it wasn't a consumer service and I > wasn't a business either. It seemed like it was some bastard service > nobody directly sold or supported. > > I still laugh when I see circuits with IBZD on them usually with an > Ameritech logo-ed tag. I had to go through my Provisioning contacts over there from work to get the fucker installed at all. Once they found out I was a residence they REALLY didn't want to install it but I was able to get it done. -- smr
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<j991rl$enu$1@ftupet.ftupet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h5ni9248pba.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<j90r22$8bm$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j937m7$rq1$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j942lp$5ea$1@news.albasani.net> <j95r6g$fjf$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j96n4m$l6u$6@news.albasani.net> <j96olo$c6s$1@reader1.panix.com> <j96vi7$5e8$1@ftupet.ftupet.com> <j990i1$le4$3@reader1.panix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,e2d62a2a0578b92b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.27.132 with SMTP id t4mr190172pbg.3.1320684602879;
Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:50:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!h5ni9248pba.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: smr <me@shawnritchie.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: random update
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:43:16 -0600
Organization: ftupet.com
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <j991rl$enu$1@ftupet.ftupet.com>
References: <j90r22$8bm$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j937m7$rq1$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j942lp$5ea$1@news.albasani.net> <j95r6g$fjf$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <j96n4m$l6u$6@news.albasani.net> <j96olo$c6s$1@reader1.panix.com> <j96vi7$5e8$1@ftupet.ftupet.com> <j990i1$le4$3@reader1.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1320684601 16897 66.246.138.5 (7 Nov 2011 16:50:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
In-Reply-To: <j990i1$le4$3@reader1.panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit