🚀 go-pugleaf

smr <me@shawnritchie.com> wrote:
>On 9/19/2011 1:16 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>smr<me@shawnritchie.com>  wrote:
>>>On 9/19/2011 12:32 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>smr<me@shawnritchie.com>   wrote:
>>>>>On 9/17/2011 8:57 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

>>>>>>Take off the rose colored glasses, because you are speaking of a time
>>>>>>long before your parents were born.

>>>>>Hi, Adam. And fuck you, too. You think having the incumbent have to
>>>>>spent a THIRD of his fucking term worrying about reelection is a good
>>>>>thing? Great, you're a dumbass. I'm not, and think it sucks.

>>>>Nice straw man, shithead.

>>>>I said you speaking speaking of politics that you never saw in your
>>>>lifetime, and that your parents never saw. Get that reading comprehension
>>>>problem fixed.

>>>That it hasn't happened in my lifetime doesn't invalidate my belief that
>>>it would be better to have the incumbent focus on his fucking job and
>>>let folks vote to that, rather than the carnival of retardation we put
>>>them through instead.

>>Oh! You want better politicians AND better voters who make an
>>informed choice and have higher expectations.

>>Good one.

>>What will you ask for next, an electorate that won't tolerate the
>>antics in Springpork every year?

>So, what, we can't even discuss better ways now because you've deemed it 
>impossible? Fuck off, shitbag, if I want to pipedream, I fucking will.

I have no objection to those who strive for political reform. I think
it's absolutely wonderful. My objection was to your remembrance of a time
that generally didn't exist.