🚀 go-pugleaf

On 9/19/2011 4:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>  wrote:
>> On 9/19/2011 1:16 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>   wrote:
>>>> On 9/19/2011 12:32 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>    wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/17/2011 8:57 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Take off the rose colored glasses, because you are speaking of a time
>>>>>>> long before your parents were born.
>
>>>>>> Hi, Adam. And fuck you, too. You think having the incumbent have to
>>>>>> spent a THIRD of his fucking term worrying about reelection is a good
>>>>>> thing? Great, you're a dumbass. I'm not, and think it sucks.
>
>>>>> Nice straw man, shithead.
>
>>>>> I said you speaking speaking of politics that you never saw in your
>>>>> lifetime, and that your parents never saw. Get that reading comprehension
>>>>> problem fixed.
>
>>>> That it hasn't happened in my lifetime doesn't invalidate my belief that
>>>> it would be better to have the incumbent focus on his fucking job and
>>>> let folks vote to that, rather than the carnival of retardation we put
>>>> them through instead.
>
>>> Oh! You want better politicians AND better voters who make an
>>> informed choice and have higher expectations.
>
>>> Good one.
>
>>> What will you ask for next, an electorate that won't tolerate the
>>> antics in Springpork every year?
>
>> So, what, we can't even discuss better ways now because you've deemed it
>> impossible? Fuck off, shitbag, if I want to pipedream, I fucking will.
>
> I have no objection to those who strive for political reform. I think
> it's absolutely wonderful. My objection was to your remembrance of a time
> that generally didn't exist.

I never claimed personal remembrance, you lying cunt. Fuck off.

-- 
smr