🚀 go-pugleaf

On 9/20/2011 7:40 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>  wrote:
>> On 9/19/2011 4:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>   wrote:
>>>> On 9/19/2011 1:16 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>    wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/19/2011 12:32 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>     wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2011 8:57 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> Take off the rose colored glasses, because you are speaking of a time
>>>>>>>>> long before your parents were born.
>
>>>>>>>> Hi, Adam. And fuck you, too. You think having the incumbent have to
>>>>>>>> spent a THIRD of his fucking term worrying about reelection is a good
>>>>>>>> thing? Great, you're a dumbass. I'm not, and think it sucks.
>
>>>>>>> Nice straw man, shithead.
>
>>>>>>> I said you speaking speaking of politics that you never saw in your
>>>>>>> lifetime, and that your parents never saw. Get that reading comprehension
>>>>>>> problem fixed.
>
>>>>>> That it hasn't happened in my lifetime doesn't invalidate my belief that
>>>>>> it would be better to have the incumbent focus on his fucking job and
>>>>>> let folks vote to that, rather than the carnival of retardation we put
>>>>>> them through instead.
>
>>>>> Oh! You want better politicians AND better voters who make an
>>>>> informed choice and have higher expectations.
>
>>>>> Good one.
>
>>>>> What will you ask for next, an electorate that won't tolerate the
>>>>> antics in Springpork every year?
>
>>>> So, what, we can't even discuss better ways now because you've deemed it
>>>> impossible? Fuck off, shitbag, if I want to pipedream, I fucking will.
>
>>> I have no objection to those who strive for political reform. I think
>>> it's absolutely wonderful. My objection was to your remembrance of a time
>>> that generally didn't exist.
>
>> I never claimed personal remembrance, you lying cunt. Fuck off.
>
> To set up your straw man, you cut your own incriminating words from
> the quotes:
>
> 	We should go back to the old days where the incumbent didn't even
> 	campaign because it was considered beneath the office. You just
> 	voted on his record.
>
> What you wrote was objectionable. It's still objectionable. Do you even
> fool yourself claiming you didn't write it?
>
> You don't remember such times. Your parents did not live in such times.
> Your grandparents did not live in such times.

I did not claim to remember those times, nor did I write anything that 
should be construed as such.

So fuck off, you tiresome dickbag.

-- 
smr