🚀 go-pugleaf

smr  <me@shawnritchie.com> wrote:
>On 9/20/2011 7:40 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>  wrote:
>>> On 9/19/2011 4:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>   wrote:
>>>>> On 9/19/2011 1:16 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>    wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/19/2011 12:32 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>>> smr<me@shawnritchie.com>     wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2011 8:57 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Take off the rose colored glasses, because you are speaking of a time
>>>>>>>>>> long before your parents were born.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Adam. And fuck you, too. You think having the incumbent have to
>>>>>>>>> spent a THIRD of his fucking term worrying about reelection is a good
>>>>>>>>> thing? Great, you're a dumbass. I'm not, and think it sucks.
>>
>>>>>>>> Nice straw man, shithead.
>>
>>>>>>>> I said you speaking speaking of politics that you never saw in your
>>>>>>>> lifetime, and that your parents never saw. Get that reading
>comprehension
>>>>>>>> problem fixed.
>>
>>>>>>> That it hasn't happened in my lifetime doesn't invalidate my belief that
>>>>>>> it would be better to have the incumbent focus on his fucking job and
>>>>>>> let folks vote to that, rather than the carnival of retardation we put
>>>>>>> them through instead.
>>
>>>>>> Oh! You want better politicians AND better voters who make an
>>>>>> informed choice and have higher expectations.
>>
>>>>>> Good one.
>>
>>>>>> What will you ask for next, an electorate that won't tolerate the
>>>>>> antics in Springpork every year?
>>
>>>>> So, what, we can't even discuss better ways now because you've deemed it
>>>>> impossible? Fuck off, shitbag, if I want to pipedream, I fucking will.
>>
>>>> I have no objection to those who strive for political reform. I think
>>>> it's absolutely wonderful. My objection was to your remembrance of a time
>>>> that generally didn't exist.
>>
>>> I never claimed personal remembrance, you lying cunt. Fuck off.
>>
>> To set up your straw man, you cut your own incriminating words from
>> the quotes:
>>
>> 	We should go back to the old days where the incumbent didn't even
>> 	campaign because it was considered beneath the office. You just
>> 	voted on his record.
>>
>> What you wrote was objectionable. It's still objectionable. Do you even
>> fool yourself claiming you didn't write it?
>>
>> You don't remember such times. Your parents did not live in such times.
>> Your grandparents did not live in such times.
>
>I did not claim to remember those times, nor did I write anything that 
>should be construed as such.

So you claim those times existed, without having known them, or knowing
anybody who knew them.

Got it.

>So fuck off, you tiresome dickbag.

No, thank you, not while you're still being highly amusing.