Article View: cle.config
Article #42Re: Proposal: stop the leaks
From: Zbigniew J. Tyrlik
Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 00:00
69 lines
3816 bytes
3816 bytes
As quoted from <bEnnx47UlVHd090yn@mome.apk.net> by sysop@mome.apk.net (March Hare): +--------------- > In article <4nagtd$b3t@junior.wariat.org>, > catfood@junior.wariat.org (Mark W. Schumann) wrote: > >I believe that for purposes of spam and velveeta deterrence we should > >follow generally accepted with standard Usenet practice: flame the small > >ones and cancel the large (BI >= 20) ones. > > sophisticated type of spam. The spam filter I'm working on looks for both > BI and number of crossposts. Very little gets caught by the BI, yet about > 75% of spams get caught by the 20 or more newsgroups rule. Since it > is a smaller feed, it is becoming quite a task actually testing out the BI > portion of it. > > If you think I'm being too restrictive, my original thought was to hit 10 or > more crossposts. Nothing pisses me off worse than coming back from a > four day business trip and waste more time going through spam than > actually reading any news actually relating to any of the groups I read. John, be aware that what you face is a limitation of OS/newsreader. Unix based newsreaders will present crossposted articel only once; after you read it in first newsgroup, you won't see it in aother newsgroups. On Dos/windows based systems, since they keep a separate copy of crossposted article for every newsgroup, massive crossposting is very painful. Still, it is OS/newsreader limitation. Also, issue of cancelling other's articles is very delicate - keep in mind that more and more often cancel articels create more traffic than original spam. Cancelin other's articles open huge can of worm - look at scientology issue. So, if you plan any kind of filter/antispam technology, please limit it to your own machine. If it will affect downfeed sites, you should make them aware that you do limit/censor traffic on your site. For this reasons, APK does not censor/restrict news traffic. We do not see advantages in trying to micromanage news flow. We belive that it is function of user interface ( newsreader ) to allow kill files, topic selection, gentle cross-posting handling etc. As long as we have resources we will carry all traffic. As a side note: APK exchanges traffic with SPrint, MCI, OARnet, CWRU, EFF - those are primary feeds, delivering everythign they have; we also have a dozen smaller inbound feeds for some more unique groups - like from Poland pl. groups; from Germany relcom.; and others. > > John > -- > //------------------------------------------------------------------------ > // momerath@apk.net sevot yhtils eht dna ,gillirb sawT` > // sysop@mome.apk.net ebaw eht ni elbmig dna eryg diD > // ,sevogorob eht erew ysmim llA > // .ebargtuo shtar emom eht dnA > In case of stupidity, break glass. > _zjt -- ******************************************************************** Zbigniew J. Tyrlik DoD# 0759 FJ1200 89-Silver... kleks@apk.net Free thinker, traveller, poet, happy father and husband.... Global One is not responsible for my acts. Neither am I.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4nn657$8be@ns2.wariat.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4na8nl$89@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> <4nagtd$b3t@junior.wariat.org> <bEnnx47UlVHd090yn@mome.apk.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103394,b4524586926531f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103394,public From: zbig@ns2.wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik) Subject: Re: Proposal: stop the leaks Date: 1996/05/19 Message-ID: <4nn657$8be@ns2.wariat.org> X-Deja-AN: 155584440 references: <4na8nl$89@madeline.INS.CWRU.Edu> <4nagtd$b3t@junior.wariat.org> <bEnnx47UlVHd090yn@mome.apk.net> organization: Akademia Pana Kleksa, Public Access Uni* Site followup-to: cle.config reply-to: kleks@apk.net(Zbigniew J. Tyrlik) newsgroups: cle.config