🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: cle.general
Article #1717

Re: Do you favor DWW checkpoints???

#1717
From: Brian Bulson
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 00:00
27 lines
1328 bytes
plato@en.com (Dan Plato) wrote:

>bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson) wrote:

>>plato@en.com (Dan Plato) wrote:

>>>bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson) wrote:

>>>>I really favor this.  Because sometimes people who DWW get in
>>>>accidents.  I would feel safer if there were DWW checkpoints.  I also
>>>>feel better if DW weren't allowed at all.

>>>Just curious but would DWW mean Driving with Women?
>>>---
>>>e-mail: plato@en.com
>>>url: http://www.en.com/users/plato/
>>>bbs: Below Zero (216)248-1891

>>Sure!  Works for me!  I don't think that should be allowed :)


>Hey I know, either do I, but oh well. We have a crazy world today =)
>What do others think?

I don't know, I would like to see some kind of statistics of how many
accidents women cause compared to men.  I don't mean to be sexist, but
they just can't drive......
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4afsf9$ram@antares.en.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4acrlp$39f@antares.en.com> <4adcj7$rlt@antares.en.com> <4adl5f$b7h@antares.en.com> <4adm39$c3q@antares.en.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 108bc6,539c0db39c8b442b
X-Google-Attributes: gid108bc6,public
From: bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson)
Subject: Re: Do you favor DWW checkpoints???
Date: 1995/12/10
Message-ID: <4afsf9$ram@antares.en.com>
X-Deja-AN: 121456770
references: <4acrlp$39f@antares.en.com> <4adcj7$rlt@antares.en.com> <4adl5f$b7h@antares.en.com> <4adm39$c3q@antares.en.com>
organization: Exchange Network Services
newsgroups: cle.general