Article View: cle.general
Article #1717Re: Do you favor DWW checkpoints???
From: Brian Bulson
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 00:00
27 lines
1328 bytes
1328 bytes
plato@en.com (Dan Plato) wrote: >bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson) wrote: >>plato@en.com (Dan Plato) wrote: >>>bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson) wrote: >>>>I really favor this. Because sometimes people who DWW get in >>>>accidents. I would feel safer if there were DWW checkpoints. I also >>>>feel better if DW weren't allowed at all. >>>Just curious but would DWW mean Driving with Women? >>>--- >>>e-mail: plato@en.com >>>url: http://www.en.com/users/plato/ >>>bbs: Below Zero (216)248-1891 >>Sure! Works for me! I don't think that should be allowed :) >Hey I know, either do I, but oh well. We have a crazy world today =) >What do others think? I don't know, I would like to see some kind of statistics of how many accidents women cause compared to men. I don't mean to be sexist, but they just can't drive......
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4afsf9$ram@antares.en.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4acrlp$39f@antares.en.com> <4adcj7$rlt@antares.en.com> <4adl5f$b7h@antares.en.com> <4adm39$c3q@antares.en.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108bc6,539c0db39c8b442b X-Google-Attributes: gid108bc6,public From: bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson) Subject: Re: Do you favor DWW checkpoints??? Date: 1995/12/10 Message-ID: <4afsf9$ram@antares.en.com> X-Deja-AN: 121456770 references: <4acrlp$39f@antares.en.com> <4adcj7$rlt@antares.en.com> <4adl5f$b7h@antares.en.com> <4adm39$c3q@antares.en.com> organization: Exchange Network Services newsgroups: cle.general