Re: Do you favor DWW checkpoints???

Article View: cle.general

Article #1718

#1718

From: Brian Bulson
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 00:00

15 lines
901 bytes

plato@en.com (Dan Plato) wrote:

>bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson) wrote:

>>I really favor this.  Because sometimes people who DWW get in
>>accidents.  I would feel safer if there were DWW checkpoints.  I also
>>feel better if DW weren't allowed at all.

>Just curious but would DWW mean Driving with Women?
>---
>e-mail: plato@en.com
>url: http://www.en.com/users/plato/
>bbs: Below Zero (216)248-1891

Sure!  Works for me!  I don't think that should be allowed :)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4adl5f$b7h@antares.en.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4acrlp$39f@antares.en.com> <4adcj7$rlt@antares.en.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 108bc6,539c0db39c8b442b
X-Google-Attributes: gid108bc6,public
From: bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson)
Subject: Re: Do you favor DWW checkpoints???
Date: 1995/12/10
Message-ID: <4adl5f$b7h@antares.en.com>
X-Deja-AN: 121562111
references: <4acrlp$39f@antares.en.com> <4adcj7$rlt@antares.en.com>
organization: Exchange Network Services
newsgroups: cle.general

Reply to Parent Message