Re: Do you favor DWW checkpoints???

Article View: cle.general

Article #1719

#1719

From: Dan Plato
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 00:00

25 lines
1191 bytes

bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson) wrote:

>plato@en.com (Dan Plato) wrote:

>>bbulson@en.com (Brian Bulson) wrote:

>>>I really favor this.  Because sometimes people who DWW get in
>>>accidents.  I would feel safer if there were DWW checkpoints.  I also
>>>feel better if DW weren't allowed at all.

>>Just curious but would DWW mean Driving with Women?
>>---
>>e-mail: plato@en.com
>>url: http://www.en.com/users/plato/
>>bbs: Below Zero (216)248-1891

>Sure!  Works for me!  I don't think that should be allowed :)


Hey I know, either do I, but oh well. We have a crazy world today =)
What do others think?
---
e-mail: plato@en.com
url: http://www.en.com/users/plato/
bbs: Below Zero (216)248-1891

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4adm39$c3q@antares.en.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4acrlp$39f@antares.en.com> <4adcj7$rlt@antares.en.com> <4adl5f$b7h@antares.en.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 108bc6,539c0db39c8b442b
X-Google-Attributes: gid108bc6,public
From: plato@en.com (Dan Plato)
Subject: Re: Do you favor DWW checkpoints???
Date: 1995/12/10
Message-ID: <4adm39$c3q@antares.en.com>
X-Deja-AN: 121562112
references: <4acrlp$39f@antares.en.com> <4adcj7$rlt@antares.en.com> <4adl5f$b7h@antares.en.com>
organization: Exchange Network Services
reply-to: plato@en.com
newsgroups: cle.general

Reply to Parent Message