🚀 go-pugleaf

Lou Duchez wrote:
> 
> In article <31AFFF52.3706@gwis.com>, chet <murray@gwis.com> wrote:
> > Lou Duchez wrote:
> I admit it: I did not feel it was worthwhile to archive for all posterity
> the post where you told someone: "Don't bother complaining to tech
> support [about the news server].  They'll just blame the problem on you."
> If I knew you'd deny having said it to your dying day, I would have
> clipped and saved it.
> 
> And I *did* admit there were problems on the newsgroups ... I just didn't
> think you should be lying about what tech support says.  You seem to
> think that made me a cheerleader; I see that as having ethical standards.
> 
> And once or twice I *did* get on peoples' cases for moaning about
> utterly trivial issues.  Which is fine, because I was also willing to
> back people when there WERE problems I felt were significant.  And it's
> my right to voice my opinions ... though it was never your right to lie
> about the staff, however.

Lou, again I never said it.  Someone, not me, said the staff was almost
hostile about him having a mac, and others said they were less than helpful
about win95 users.  And now, you even admit, in a newsgroup where people
are there to post about their problems, you think you (an non-employee 
cheerleader of en.com) should judge what is a valid problem and what is not.
The only reason no one from en.com stepped in, is you kept saying en.com
was great even though the news server crashed almost everyday.
 
> > >He likewise had a
> > > problem with tech support staff that weren't psychic enough to predict
> > > the future, and honestly admitted that they didn't know exactly when the
> > > system would be back up again after a fix.
> >
> > If you called and asked if the system was down you got multiple responses.
> 
> You complained, point blank, when mikem said he wasn't a psychic because
> he couldn't tell you exactly when the system would be up.  I didn't
> bother to clip and save that post either, but we both know it's true.
> In any event, you even found yourself complaining when tech support
> gave you the least bullshitty of answers: "We don't know".  And still
> you found that sort of evasiveness to be a problem.

Please lou, for once get something straight, I complained when I called
tech support to see when the system would be back up and was told
by mikem "If I knew that I would be a psychic"  It took another phone
call to someone else their to find out it would be fixed within an
hour, sorry but when someone is expecting me to send them something 
thru e-mail and I can't, I need to know when I can.  

For those of you who don't know lou, I don't know why I bother even
replying to him.  On every newsgroup he participates in he attacks,
attacks and attacks with no point or sense.  Its funny to scan thru
dejanews and see all the hate responses he generates.