🚀 go-pugleaf

On Oct 16, 10:21 am, lib_o_matic <r...@co.bass> wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 8:30 AM, chatnoir wrote:
>
> > 10/20: ZOMBIE MARCH AGAINST CORPORATE MEDIA: Rise up against the mind
> > control of propaganda, censorship, and advertising!
>
> Yes, the left wing media must be killed.
>
> http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/143...
>
> THE ARGUMENT over whether the national press is dominated by liberals is
> over. Since 1962, there have been 11 surveys of the media that sought
> the political views of hundreds of journalists. In 1971, they were 53
> percent liberal, 17 percent conservative. In a 1976 survey of the
> Washington press corps, it was 59 percent liberal, 18 percent
> conservative. A 1985 poll of 3,200 reporters found them to be
> self-identified as 55 percent liberal, 17 percent conservative. In 1996,
> another survey of Washington journalists pegged the breakdown as 61
> percent liberal, 9 percent conservative. Now, the new study by the Pew
> Research Center for the People and the Press found the national media to
> be 34 percent liberal and 7 percent conservative.
>
> Over 40-plus years, the only thing that's changed in the media's
> politics is that many national journalists have now cleverly decided to
> call themselves moderates. But their actual views haven't changed, the
> Pew survey showed. Their political beliefs are close to those of
> self-identified liberals and nowhere near those of conservatives. And
> the proportion of liberals to conservatives in the press, either 3-to-1
> or 4-to-1, has stayed the same. That liberals are dominant is now beyond
> dispute.
>
> Does this affect coverage? Is there really liberal bias? The answers
> are, of course, yes and yes. It couldn't be any other way.

The Weekly Standard?????????????