🚀 go-pugleaf

On 10/16/2012 6:56 PM, chatnoir wrote:
> On Oct 16, 10:21 am, lib_o_matic<r...@co.bass>  wrote:
>> On 10/16/2012 8:30 AM, chatnoir wrote:
>>
>>> 10/20: ZOMBIE MARCH AGAINST CORPORATE MEDIA: Rise up against the mind
>>> control of propaganda, censorship, and advertising!
>>
>> Yes, the left wing media must be killed.
>>
>> http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/143...
>>
>> THE ARGUMENT over whether the national press is dominated by liberals is
>> over. Since 1962, there have been 11 surveys of the media that sought
>> the political views of hundreds of journalists. In 1971, they were 53
>> percent liberal, 17 percent conservative. In a 1976 survey of the
>> Washington press corps, it was 59 percent liberal, 18 percent
>> conservative. A 1985 poll of 3,200 reporters found them to be
>> self-identified as 55 percent liberal, 17 percent conservative. In 1996,
>> another survey of Washington journalists pegged the breakdown as 61
>> percent liberal, 9 percent conservative. Now, the new study by the Pew
>> Research Center for the People and the Press found the national media to
>> be 34 percent liberal and 7 percent conservative.
>>
>> Over 40-plus years, the only thing that's changed in the media's
>> politics is that many national journalists have now cleverly decided to
>> call themselves moderates. But their actual views haven't changed, the
>> Pew survey showed. Their political beliefs are close to those of
>> self-identified liberals and nowhere near those of conservatives. And
>> the proportion of liberals to conservatives in the press, either 3-to-1
>> or 4-to-1, has stayed the same. That liberals are dominant is now beyond
>> dispute.
>>
>> Does this affect coverage? Is there really liberal bias? The answers
>> are, of course, yes and yes. It couldn't be any other way.
>
> The Weekly Standard?????????????

Pew Research Center?

Think quickly 'donald', you may need to real soon....