Article View: comp.arch.storage
Article #444Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
From: Colin Andrew Percival
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00
13 lines
1482 bytes
1482 bytes
Bill Todd (billtodd@foo.mv.com) wrote: : I suspect that statement included an implied "... and still support 2 : drives' worth of data on 4 drives total." Clearly you could just mirror the : same single drive's worth of data on all 4 drives and tolerate the : simultaneous loss of any *3*, and with a bit more ingenuity you could rotate : 1.333... drives' worth of data around the 4 drives and tolerate the : simultaneous loss of any 2. And with even more ingenuity you could distribute 2-epsilon drives worth of data around the four drives and tolerate the simultaneous loss of any two. Colin Percival
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7o3pa2$dl4$1@morgoth.sfu.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37A02675.23233EB8@sni.de> <EF4B31908F2A7BAC.E7C81737A020640C.DF7A420979E4C82E@lp.airnews.net> <7nsoie$5g1$2@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <7nsqjj$onj$1@pyrite.mv.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public From: cperciva@sfu.ca (Colin Andrew Percival) Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ? Date: 1999/08/02 Message-ID: <7o3pa2$dl4$1@morgoth.sfu.ca> X-Deja-AN: 507895826 References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37A02675.23233EB8@sni.de> <EF4B31908F2A7BAC.E7C81737A020640C.DF7A420979E4C82E@lp.airnews.net> <7nsoie$5g1$2@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <7nsqjj$onj$1@pyrite.mv.net> Organization: Simon Fraser University Followup-To: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage