Article View: comp.arch.storage
Article #445Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
From: Kevin Strietzel
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00
56 lines
3088 bytes
3088 bytes
highend wrote: > In article > <EF4B31908F2A7BAC.E7C81737A020640C.DF7A420979E4C82E@lp.airnews.net>, > malc@cwix.com says... > >On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:01:25 +0200, Ren� K�hnen Wiesemes > ><koehnen.pad@sni.de> caused to appear as if it was written: > > > >>none of your suggested solutions will work > >>for 2 simultaneously HD failures: > > > >True. > > > >>RAID 1 (stripping) gives none fault tolerance at all. > >>If you mirrored two RAID 1 groups, only one part > >>can be out of order without data loss. > > > >You're confusing RAID0, which is striping, with RAID1, which is mirroring. > > > >With the suggested scheme, drive 0 would be mirrored with drive 2, drive 1 > >with drive 3, then stripe the two pairs together. You can lose the *right* > >two drives (e.g. 0 and 1 or 3, 1 and 0 or 2, etc). but not the wrong pair > >(i.e. 0 and 2, 1 and 3) > > > >>> If I am interested in having storage fault tolerant up to > >>> 2 x HD failure, which option will be good ? > >>> > >>> Option #1 RAID 1 with 4 HDs, i.e. 2 pairs > >>> Option #2 RAID 5 with 4 HDs, i.e. 3 in group, 1 standby > > true > RAID 5 would only support the loss of one drive at a time > and i can't think of anything that would support the loss of "any" > 2 drives at once ... I was going to say: Something like RAID 5, but with the parity stripes mirrored across two drives. But this still doesn't let you recover from all cases. Easiest to think about in RAID 4 terms: you can lose both parity disks, or one parity disk and one data disk, but if you lose two data disks you're stuck. Then I realized: Think about this in ECC terms. Use enough parity stripes/disks to implement double-bit correction. I don't know how many this takes, but it's relatively a lot. Given Options #1 and #2 above, I'd probably choose #2, if I could stand running degraded. And as somebody else posted, the drives themselves aren't the only things to fail. Adapters, cabling, fans, and power supplies also fail. --Kevin Strietzel --Not speaking for my employer. (PS - Virtually all of Stratus Computer customers use only mirroring and concatenation, but until relatively recently that's all we directly supported.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37A7878F.2EF6FF63@Stratus.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37A02675.23233EB8@sni.de> <EF4B31908F2A7BAC.E7C81737A020640C.DF7A420979E4C82E@lp.airnews.net> <7nsoie$5g1$2@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public From: Kevin Strietzel <Kevin_Strietzel@Stratus.COM> Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ? Date: 1999/08/03 Message-ID: <37A7878F.2EF6FF63@Stratus.COM> X-Deja-AN: 508580157 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37A02675.23233EB8@sni.de> <EF4B31908F2A7BAC.E7C81737A020640C.DF7A420979E4C82E@lp.airnews.net> <7nsoie$5g1$2@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net> Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage