Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?

Article View: comp.arch.storage

Article #453

#453

From: Malcolm Weir
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:00

18 lines
1608 bytes

On Fri, 17 Sep 1999 19:07:36 +0800, "TPoh" <fjw@pacific.net.sg> caused to
appear as if it was written:

>Is RAID-6 actually implemented?
>
>I always thought that it's just a concept.

StorageTek's Iceberg does it.

>Isabelle Schmidt <flaven@t-online.de> wrote in message
>news:37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de...
>> RAID-5 tolerates only one HD failture and no HD error!
>>
>> The RAID-level you are looking for is RAID-6, that means, you have two
>> spares. A RAIS-6 Array can correct an HD error and can tolerant up to
>> two defect HDs. These controllers are very expensive.

Malc.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C73C0321964FA30C.177ADC7DC6879AEF.1C6DD419576765CB@lp.airnews.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <7rt7dp$6uv$1@newton3.pacific.net.sg>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
From: malc@cwix.com (Malcolm Weir)
Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
Date: 1999/09/17
Message-ID: <C73C0321964FA30C.177ADC7DC6879AEF.1C6DD419576765CB@lp.airnews.net>
X-Deja-AN: 526444477
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <7rt7dp$6uv$1@newton3.pacific.net.sg>
X-Orig-Message-ID: <37e29109.11386926@library.airnews.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Time: Fri Sep 17 14:38:13 1999
Organization: Little to None
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library2.airnews.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage

Reply to Parent Message