Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?

Article View: comp.arch.storage

Article #454

#454

From: Steven Perez
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:00

18 lines
1476 bytes

Maybe that's why they are so expensive ?


TPoh wrote in message <7rt7dp$6uv$1@newton3.pacific.net.sg>...
>Is RAID-6 actually implemented?
>
>I always thought that it's just a concept.
>
>Isabelle Schmidt <flaven@t-online.de> wrote in message
>news:37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de...
>> RAID-5 tolerates only one HD failture and no HD error!
>>
>> The RAID-level you are looking for is RAID-6, that means, you have two
>> spares. A RAIS-6 Array can correct an HD error and can tolerant up to
>> two defect HDs. These controllers are very expensive.
>
>
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <937635418.3763.0.nnrp-04.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <7rt7dp$6uv$1@newton3.pacific.net.sg>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public
From: "Steven Perez" <steve@uninet.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
Date: 1999/09/17
Message-ID: <937635418.3763.0.nnrp-04.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 526604882
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: uninet.demon.co.uk:158.152.183.44
References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <7rt7dp$6uv$1@newton3.pacific.net.sg>
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 937635418 nnrp-04:3763 NO-IDENT uninet.demon.co.uk:158.152.183.44
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net

Reply to Parent Message