Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?

Article View: comp.arch.storage

Article #455

#455

From: Mark Landin
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 00:00

10 lines
1121 bytes

On Fri, 17 Sep 1999 07:54:19 +0100, "Steven Perez"
<steve@uninet.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Kenneth:
>
>Go with RAID 1/0  Stripe, and mirror. This will give the very best
>performance, and availability, although it will give the least amount of
>storage.

How is RAID 0/1 more "available" than RAID 5?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <37e660eb.12904299@news.earthlink.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <937569107.3977.0.nnrp-11.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
From: m555@earthlink.net (Mark Landin)
Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
Date: 1999/09/20
Message-ID: <37e660eb.12904299@news.earthlink.net>
X-Deja-AN: 527510384
X-ELN-Insert-Date: Mon Sep 20 10:35:02 1999
References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <937569107.3977.0.nnrp-11.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk>
Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc.
X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage
X-ELN-Date: 20 Sep 1999 16:25:11 GMT

Reply to Parent Message