Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?

Article View: comp.arch.storage

Article #458

#458

From: Mark Landin
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:00

9 lines
1204 bytes

On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 22:41:48 GMT, malc@cwix.com (Malcolm Weir) wrote:


>>How is RAID 0/1 more "available" than RAID 5?
>
>It can tolerate failure of at least one drive, and possibly more than one
>(depending on which drive has already failed).

Ah. I understand. Thanks. :)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <37e78cad.4440378@news.earthlink.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <937569107.3977.0.nnrp-11.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk> <37e660eb.12904299@news.earthlink.net> <18C490171C327516.3370D2056312FC17.5E5A41D3D5C007EB@lp.airnews.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public
From: m555@earthlink.net (Mark Landin)
Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
Date: 1999/09/21
Message-ID: <37e78cad.4440378@news.earthlink.net>
X-Deja-AN: 527822293
X-ELN-Insert-Date: Tue Sep 21 06:45:08 1999
References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <937569107.3977.0.nnrp-11.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk> <37e660eb.12904299@news.earthlink.net> <18C490171C327516.3370D2056312FC17.5E5A41D3D5C007EB@lp.airnews.net>
Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc.
X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage
X-ELN-Date: 21 Sep 1999 13:44:40 GMT

Reply to Parent Message