Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?

Article View: comp.arch.storage

Article #459

#459

From: Jim Pappe
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00

17 lines
1350 bytes

with Raid 5 plus hot spare - 2 drive can fail ..
www.raidexpert.com

Mark Landin <m555@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:37e660eb.12904299@news.earthlink.net...
> On Fri, 17 Sep 1999 07:54:19 +0100, "Steven Perez"
> <steve@uninet.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >Kenneth:
> >
> >Go with RAID 1/0  Stripe, and mirror. This will give the very best
> >performance, and availability, although it will give the least amount of
> >storage.
>
> How is RAID 0/1 more "available" than RAID 5?
>
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7sehd5$80a@journal.concentric.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <937569107.3977.0.nnrp-11.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk> <37e660eb.12904299@news.earthlink.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
From: "Jim Pappe" <jim@dynamicnetworkfactory.com>
Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
Date: 1999/09/23
Message-ID: <7sehd5$80a@journal.concentric.net>
X-Deja-AN: 528864163
References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <937569107.3977.0.nnrp-11.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk> <37e660eb.12904299@news.earthlink.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage

Reply to Parent Message